-
12Left-Libertarianism as a Promising Form of Liberal EgalitarianismPhilosophic Exchange 39 (1). 2009.Left libertarianism is a theory of justice that is committed to full self-ownership and to an egalitarian sharing of the value of natural resources. It is, I shall suggest, a promising way of capturing the liberal egalitarian values of liberty, security, equality, and prosperity.
-
46D. D. Raphaell, Concepts of Justice, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 2001, pp. 256Utilitas 15 (1): 112. 2003.
-
18Rights Based ParetianismCanadian Journal of Philosophy 18 (3). 1988.An ethical theory is axiological just in case it makes the permissibility of actions depend solely on considerations of goodness. Act utilitarianism is the paradigm axiological theory. An ethical theory is a pure rights theory just in case it judges an action permissible if and only if it violates no one’s rights. Libertarianism is a paradigm pure rights theory. I shall formulate and defend a type of axiological theory that, unlike act utilitarianism, is sensitive in a new and interesting way to…Read more
-
220Contractarianism and Rational Choice: Essays on David Gauthier's Morals by Agreement (edited book)Cambridge University Press. 1991.David Gauthier's Morals by Agreement is the most complete and suggestive contractarian theory of morality since the work of Rawls. In this anthology a number of prominent moral and political philosophers offer a critical assessment of Gauthier's theory and its three main projects: developing a contractarian foundation for morality, defending a theory of rational choice, and supporting the claim that rationality requires one to keep one's agreements. An introduction sets out Gauthier's project, w…Read more
-
172Infinite Utility and Temporal NeutralityUtilitas 6 (2): 193. 1994.Suppose that time is infinitely long towards the future, and that each feasible action produces a finite amount of utility at each time. Then, under appropriate conditions, each action produces an infinite amount of utility. Does this mean that utilitarianism lacks the resources to discriminate among such actions? Since each action produces the same infinite amount of utility, it seems that utilitarianism must judge all actions permissible, judge all actions impermissible, or remain completely s…Read more
-
154Infinite utilitarianism: More is always betterEconomics and Philosophy 20 (2): 307-330. 2004.We address the question of how finitely additive moral value theories (such as utilitarianism) should rank worlds when there are an infinite number of locations of value (people, times, etc.). In the finite case, finitely additive theories satisfy both Weak Pareto and a strong anonymity condition. In the infinite case, however, these two conditions are incompatible, and thus a question arises as to which of these two conditions should be rejected. In a recent contribution, Hamkins and Montero (2…Read more
-
1Gopal Sreenivasan, The Limits of Lockean Rights in Property Reviewed byPhilosophy in Review 18 (1): 62-64. 1998.
-
2
-
353“Answers to five questions on normative ethics”In Jesper Ryberg & Thomas S. Peterson (eds.), Normative Ethics: Five Questions, Automatic Press/vip. 2007.I came late to philosophy and even later to normative ethics. When I started my undergraduate studies at the University of Toronto in 1970, I was interested in mathematics and languages. I soon discovered, however, that my mathematical talents were rather meager compared to the truly talented. I therefore decided to study actuarial science (the applied mathematics of risk assessment for insurance and pension plans) rather than abstract math. After two years, however, I dropped out of university,…Read more
-
634The nomic role account of carving reality at the jointsSynthese 115 (2): 171-198. 1998.Natural properties are those that carve reality at the joints. The notion of carving reality at the joints, however, is somewhat obscure, and is often understood in terms of making for similarity, conferring causal powers, or figuring in the laws of nature. I develop and assess an account of the third sort according to which carving reality at the joints is understood as having the right level of determinacy relative to nomic roles. The account has the attraction of involving very weak metaphysi…Read more
-
276Explicating lawhoodPhilosophy of Science 55 (4): 598-613. 1988.D. M. Armstrong, Michael Tooley, and Fred Dretske have recently proposed a new realist account of laws of nature, according to which laws of nature are objective relations between universals. After criticizing this account, I develop an alternative realist account, according to which (1) the nomic structure of a world is a relation between initial world-histories and world-histories, and (2) a law of nature is a fact that holds solely in virtue of nomic structure (and not, for example, in virtue…Read more
-
1065Moral dilemmas and comparative conceptions of moralitySouthern Journal of Philosophy 30 (1): 117-124. 1992.Earl Conee is a well known contemporary defender of the impossibility of moral dilemmas. In his 1982 paper "Against Moral Dilemmas" he argued that moral dilemmas are impossible because the existence of such a dilemma would entail that some obligatory action is forbidden, which is absurd. More recently, in "Why Moral Dilemmas are Impossible" he has defended the impossibility of moral dilemmas by claiming that the moral status of an action depends in part on the moral status of its alternatives…Read more
-
29Welfare, Happiness, and Ethics, LW Sumner. Oxford University Press, 1996, 239+ xii pagesEconomics and Philosophy 13 (2): 330-. 1997.
-
13“The connection between prudential goodness and moral permissibility”, journal of social philosophy 24 (1993): 105-28Journal of Social Philosophy 24 (2): 105-28. 1993.The basic idea of the theorem is not very new: it is a slight generalization of a theorem proved by John Harsanyi in the 1950s.[i] The power of the book comes from his interpretation of the theorem, and from his strikingly clear and insightful discussion of the various conditions.
-
27Left-Libertarianism: A PrimerIn Peter Vallentyne & Hillel Steiner (eds.), Left Libertarianism and Its Critics: The Contemporary Debate, Palgrave Publishers. 2000.Left-libertarian theories of justice hold that agents are full self-owners and that natural resources are owned in some egalitarian manner. Unlike most versions of egalitarianism, leftlibertarianism endorses full self-ownership, and thus places specific limits on what others may do to one’s person without one’s permission. Unlike the more familiar right-libertarianism (which also endorses full self-ownership), it holds that natural resources—resources which are not the results of anyone's choice…Read more
-
27
-
27Review: Self-Ownership and Equality: Brute Luck, Gifts, Universal Dominance, and Leximin (review)Ethics 107 (2). 1997.
-
David Braybrooke, Bryson Brown, and Peter Schotch (with two chapters by Laura Byrne), Logic on the Track of Social Change Reviewed byPhilosophy in Review 16 (5): 315-317. 1996.
-
292Who are the least advantaged?In Nils Holtug & Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (eds.), Egalitarianism: New Essays on the Nature and Value of Equality, Oxford University Press. pp. 174--95. 2006.The difference principle, introduced by Rawls (1971, 1993), is generally interpreted as leximin, but this is not how he intended it. Rawls explicitly states that the difference principle requires that aggregate benefits (e.g., average or total) to those in the least advantaged group be given lexical priority over benefits to others, where the least advantaged group includes more than the strictly worst off individuals. We study the implications of adopting different approaches to the definition …Read more
-
581Justice in general: An introductionIn Equality and Justice: Justice in General, Routledge. 2003.This is the first volume of Equality and Justice, a six-volume collection of the most important articles of the twentieth century on the topic of justice and equality. This volume addresses the following three (only loosely related) issues: (1) What is the concept of justice? (2) Is justice primarily a demand on individuals or on societies? (3) What are the relative merits of conceptions of justice based on equality, based on priority for those who have less, and based on ensuring that everyone …Read more
-
23Book Review:The Limits of Hobbesian Contractarianism. Jody Kraus (review)Ethics 106 (1): 193-. 1995.
-
24Review (review)Theoria 73 (2): 179-186. 2007.Théories Économiques de la Justice, Marc FleurbaeyModern Theories of Justice, Serge-Christophe KolmTheories of Distributive Justice, John Roemer
-
27Infinity in ethics (2nd ed.)Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2019.Puzzles can arise in value theory and deontic (permissibility) theory when infinity is involved. These puzzles can arise for ethics, for prudence, or for any normative perspective. For the sake of simplicity, we focus on the ethical versions of these problems. We start by addressing problems that can arise in determining what is permissible, either in a given choice situation when there are an infinite number of options or in infinite sequence of choice situations, each with only finitely many o…Read more
Areas of Specialization
Normative Ethics |
Social and Political Philosophy |
Areas of Interest
Metaphysics |
Philosophy of Action |