• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Benjamin Hill

University of Western Ontario
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    35
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    5
  •  News and Updates
    13

 More details
  • University of Western Ontario
    Department of Philosophy
    Associate Professor
University of Iowa
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 2003
London, Ontario, Canada
Areas of Specialization
Epistemology
17th/18th Century Philosophy
Areas of Interest
17th/18th Century Philosophy
  • All publications (35)
  • Catherine Wilson, Epicureanism at the Origins of Modernity (review)
    Philosophy in Review 29 (6): 442. 2009.
    17th/18th Century PhilosophyEpicureans, Misc
  •  6
    'Resemblance'and Locke's primary-secondary quality distinction
    Locke Studies 4 89-122. 2004.
    Locke: Primary and Secondary Qualities
  •  201
    Locke on Propositions and Assertion
    Modern Schoolman 85 (3): 187-205. 2008.
    Locke: Propositional AttitudesAssertion, MiscPropositions, Misc
  •  80
    W. J. Mander, The Philosophy of John Norris Reviewed by (review)
    Philosophy in Review 30 (3): 208-211. 2010.
    17th/18th Century British Philosophy, MiscCambridge Platonism
  •  229
    Of liberty and necessity: The free will debate in eighteenth-century British philosophy (review)
    Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (4). 2008.
    Early modern historians and philosophers interested in human freedom can profitably read this book, which provides a synoptic view of the eighteenth-century British free will debate from Locke through Dugald Stewart. Scholars have not ignored the debate, but as they have tended to focus on canonical figures , the author’s inclusion of lesser-known yet significant thinkers such as Lord Kames, Jonathan Edwards, and James Beattie is especially welcome. The main thesis of James Harris’s book is that…Read more
    Early modern historians and philosophers interested in human freedom can profitably read this book, which provides a synoptic view of the eighteenth-century British free will debate from Locke through Dugald Stewart. Scholars have not ignored the debate, but as they have tended to focus on canonical figures , the author’s inclusion of lesser-known yet significant thinkers such as Lord Kames, Jonathan Edwards, and James Beattie is especially welcome. The main thesis of James Harris’s book is that the eighteenth-century British debate was animated by a general commitment to “experimentalism,” i.e., the view that we should be faithful to the data of our experiences of willing. Locke initiated the turn to experimentalism, but in Harris’s judgment it was Hume who first fully adopted it. Of course, Hume’s deflationary moves did nothing to slow the debate, let alone settle it, and necessitarians continued to battle libertarians
    Libertarianism about Free WillCompatibilismHume: Free WillHume: Intellectual Context17th/18th Centur…Read more
    Libertarianism about Free WillCompatibilismHume: Free WillHume: Intellectual Context17th/18th Century British Philosophy, MiscLocke: Free Will
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback