• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Philip Pettit

Australian National UniversityPrinceton University
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    462
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    24
  •  News and Updates
    138

 More details
  • Australian National University
    School of Philosophy
    Regular Faculty (Part-time)
  • Princeton University
    Department of Philosophy
    Regular Faculty (Part-time)
Queen's University, Belfast
School of History, Anthropology, Philosophy and Politics
PhD, 1970
Homepage
Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Philosophy of Mind
Normative Ethics
Social and Political Philosophy
Areas of Interest
Epistemology
Social and Political Philosophy
Philosophy of Law
Normative Ethics
Meta-Ethics
Philosophy of Mind
Philosophy of Language
Philosophy of Action
Metaphysics
17th/18th Century Philosophy
5 more
  • All publications (462)
  •  163
    Found: The Missing Explanation
    with Peter Menzies
    Analysis 53 (2). 1993.
  •  314
    The Cunning of Trust
    Philosophy and Public Affairs 24 (3): 202-225. 1995.
    TrustSocial and Political Philosophy
  •  184
    Microphysicalism, dottism, and reduction
    Analysis 55 (3): 141-46. 1995.
    Formulating Physicalism
  •  18
    Chapter five. Using words to incorporate
    In Made with Words: Hobbes on Language, Mind, and Politics, Princeton University Press. pp. 70-83. 2009.
  •  183
    A definition of negative liberty
    Ratio 2 (2): 153-168. 1989.
    Social and Political PhilosophyFreedom and Liberty
  •  90
    Preserving the prisoner's dilemma
    Synthese 68 (1). 1986.
  •  2236
    Freedom as antipower
    Ethics 106 (3): 576-604. 1996.
    Freedom and Liberty
  •  149
    A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy (edited book)
    with Robert E. Goodin and Thomas W. Pogge
    Wiley-Blackwell. 2012.
    This new edition of _A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy_ has been extended significantly to include 55 chapters across two volumes written by some of today's most distinguished scholars. New contributors include some of today’s most distinguished scholars, among them Thomas Pogge, Charles Beitz, and Michael Doyle Provides in-depth coverage of contemporary philosophical debate in all major related disciplines, such as economics, history, law, political science, international relatio…Read more
    This new edition of _A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy_ has been extended significantly to include 55 chapters across two volumes written by some of today's most distinguished scholars. New contributors include some of today’s most distinguished scholars, among them Thomas Pogge, Charles Beitz, and Michael Doyle Provides in-depth coverage of contemporary philosophical debate in all major related disciplines, such as economics, history, law, political science, international relations and sociology Presents analysis of key political ideologies, including new chapters on Cosmopolitanism and Fundamentalism Includes detailed discussions of major concepts in political philosophy, including virtue, power, human rights, and just war.
    Feminist Political Philosophy
  •  95
    Towards a Social Democratic Theory
    democratic approach which sets it in contrast to liberal democratic theories. This is pursued by contrasting the different interpretations of the ideal of equal respect..
    Government and Democracy
  •  89
    Law and Liberty
    In Samantha Besson & José Luis Martí (eds.), Legal Republicanism: National and International Perspectives, Oxford University Press. 2009.
    Social and Political PhilosophyFreedom and LibertyPolitical Theory
  •  23
    Contents
    In Made with Words: Hobbes on Language, Mind, and Politics, Princeton University Press. 2009.
    The Contents of Perception
  •  224
    The Virtual Reality of Homo Economicus
    The Monist 78 (3): 308-329. 1995.
    The economic explanation of individual behaviour, even behaviour outside the traditional province of the market, projects a distinctively economic image on the minds of the agents involved. It suggests that, in regard to motivation and rationality, they conform to the profile of homo economicus. But this suggestion, by many lights, flies in the face of common sense; it conflicts with our ordinary assumptions about how we each feel and think in most situations, certainly most non-market situation…Read more
    The economic explanation of individual behaviour, even behaviour outside the traditional province of the market, projects a distinctively economic image on the minds of the agents involved. It suggests that, in regard to motivation and rationality, they conform to the profile of homo economicus. But this suggestion, by many lights, flies in the face of common sense; it conflicts with our ordinary assumptions about how we each feel and think in most situations, certainly most non-market situations, and about how that feeling and thought manifests itself in action. What, then, to conclude? That common sense is deeply in error on these matters? That, on the contrary, economics is in error—at least about non-market behaviour—and common sense sound? Or that some form of reconciliation is available between the two perspectives? This paper is an attempt to defend a conciliationist position.
    Virtual Reality, Misc
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • …
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback