• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Mieszko Tałasiewicz

University of Warsaw
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    40
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    1
  •  News and Updates
    7

 More details
  • University of Warsaw
    Faculty of Philosophy
    Professor
University of Warsaw
Institute of Philosophy
PhD, 1999
Warsaw, Poland
0000-0003-1933-4759
Areas of Specialization
Metaphysics and Epistemology
Areas of Interest
Metaphysics
Philosophy of Language
Philosophy of Mind
Philosophy of Religion
Metaphysics and Epistemology
Metaphilosophy
1 more
  • All publications (40)
  •  2
    Pragmatyczna koncepcja nieostrości
    Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 41 (1): 101-113. 2002.
  •  28
    Można w coś wierzyć! (polemika z książką Bogdana Chwedeńczuka, „Trzeba w coś wierzyć?”)
    Etyka 30 200-211. 1997.
  • Analiza semantyczno-kategorialna. Badanie gramatyczności, czy ustalanie sensu
    Filozofia Nauki 1. 2001.
    In the paper the author tries to show that semantico-categorial analysis in the traditional Ajdukiewiczian application as a tool of evaluating semantic completeness of complex expressions is ineffective. There is, however, another application, to which the analysis is much better fitted. Namely, it allows to precisify the actual uses of natural language - in all those cases in which on the one hand precision is a superior value, and on the other hand, the formalisation is not possible and one ha…Read more
    In the paper the author tries to show that semantico-categorial analysis in the traditional Ajdukiewiczian application as a tool of evaluating semantic completeness of complex expressions is ineffective. There is, however, another application, to which the analysis is much better fitted. Namely, it allows to precisify the actual uses of natural language - in all those cases in which on the one hand precision is a superior value, and on the other hand, the formalisation is not possible and one has to stay within natural language. Obviously, in order to achieve this aim many particular problems, sometimes not at all trivial, have to be solved. Amongst the most important the author sees determining a binding canon of the rules of analysis and determining pragmatic criteria of the admissibility of paraphrases and of filling in ellipses
  • Własność i znaczenie
    Studia Semiotyczne 25 165-185. 2004.
  • On the Concept of Rationality
    Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 89 485-503. 2006.
  • Kilka komentarzy do uwag Wiesława Walentukiewicza
    Ruch Filozoficzny 4 (4). 2007.
  •  2
    Rodzaje niejednoznaczności opisu składniowego wyrażeń
    Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 48 (4): 145-154. 2003.
    Polish Philosophy
  • Nauka i teologia: konflikt wyobrażeń [polemika]
    Zagadnienia Filozoficzne W Nauce 44. 2009.
  •  33
    Categorial Grammar and the Foundations of the Philosophy of Language
    In Piotr Stalmaszczyk (ed.), Philosophy of Language and Linguistics: The Legacy of Frege, Russell, and Wittgenstein, De Gruyter. pp. 269-294. 2014.
    Philosophy of Linguistics
  •  1
    Wyobrażenia w nauce iw teologii
    Studia Philosophiae Christianae 46 (1): 65-71. 2010.
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback