•  948
    First published in 1995. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company
  •  10
    Review: Time and space (review)
    Mind 112 (447): 509-513. 2003.
  •  40
  •  103
    Presentism, Ontology and Temporal Experience
    Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 50 73-90. 2002.
    In a recent article, ‘Tensed Time and Our Differential Experience of the Past and Future,’ William Lane Craig attempts to resuscitate A. N. Prior's ‘Thank Goodness’ argument against the B-theory by combining it with Plantinga's views about basic beliefs. In essence Craig's view is that since there is a universal experience and belief in the objectivity of tense and the reality of becoming, ‘this belief constitutes an intrinsic defeater-defeater which overwhelms the objections brought against it.…Read more
  •  26
    The "timelessness" of time
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 38 (2): 228-233. 1977.
  •  132
    On the Experience of Tenseless Time
    Journal of Philosophical Research 18 159-166. 1993.
    Defending the tenseless theory of time requires dealing adequately with the experience of temporal becoming. The issue centers on whether the defender of tenseless time can provide an adequate analysis of the presence of experience and the appropriateness of certain of our attitudes toward future and past events. By responding to a recent article, ‘Passage and the Presenee of Experience’, by H. Scott Hestevold, I shall attempt to show that adequate analysis of tenseless time is possible.
  •  189
    Since McTaggart first proposed his paradox asserting the unreality of time, numerous philosophers have attempted to defend the tensed theory of time against it. Certainly, one of the most highly developed and original is that put forth by Quentin Smith. Through discussing McTaggart's positive conception of time as well as his negative attack on its reality, I hope to clarify the dispute between those who believe in the existence of the transitory temporal properties of pastness, presentness and …Read more
  •  537
    The new tenseless theory of time: A reply to Smith
    Philosophical Studies 58 (3). 1990.
    Quentin Smith has argued (Philosophical Studies, 1987, pp. 371-392) that the token-reflexive and the date versions of the new tenseless theory of time are open to insurmountable difficulties. I argue that Smith's central arguments are irrelevant since they rest upon methodological assumptions accepted by the old tenseless theory, but rejected by the new tenseless theory
  •  6
    Delmas Lewis on Persons and Responsibility: A Critique
    Philosophy Research Archives 13 181-187. 1987.
    Delmas Lewis has argued that the tenseless view of time is committed to a view of personal identity according to which no one can be held morally responsible for their actions. His argument, if valid, is a serious objection to the tenseless view. The purpose of this paper is to defend the detenser by pointing out the pitfalls in Lewis’ argument.
  •  33
    Time and foreknowledge: A critique of Zagzebski: L. Nathan Oaklander
    Religious Studies 31 (1): 101-103. 1995.
    One problem facing those who attempt to reconcile divine foreknowledge with human freedom is to explain how a temporal God can have knowledge of the future, if the future does not exist. In her recent book, The Dilemma of Freedom and Foreknowledge , Linda Zagzebski attempts to provide an explanation by making use of a fourdimensional model in which the past, present and future exist. In this note I argue that the model Zagzebski offers to support the coplausibility of divine foreknowledge and hu…Read more
  •  8
    Resemblances and universals: A reply to J. Nammour
    Mind 84 (335): 436-439. 1975.
    Peer Reviewed.
  •  188
    It is customary in current philosophy of time to distinguish between an A- (or tensed) and a B- (or tenseless) theory of time. It is also customary to distinguish between an old B-theory of time, and a new B-theory of time. We may say that the former holds both semantic atensionalism and ontological atensionalism, whereas the latter gives up semantic atensionalism and retains ontological atensionalism. It is typically assumed that the B-theorists have been induced by advances in the philosophy o…Read more
  •  40
    Thank Goodness It's over
    Philosophy 67 (260). 1992.
    Peer Reviewed.
  •  6
    Propositions, facts, and becoming
    Philosophical Studies 29 (6). 1976.
    Peer Reviewed.
  •  44
  •  11
    The philosophy of time (edited book)
    Routledge. 2008.
    What is the nature of temporal passage—the movement of events or moments of time from the future through the present into the past? Is the future and the past as real as the present, or is the present—or perhaps the present and the past—all that exists? What role, if any, does language play in giving us an insight into temporal reality? Is it possible to travel through time into distant regions of the future or the past? What accounts for the direction of time, the sense we have that we are movi…Read more
  •  108
    Is There a Difference Between the Metaphysics of A- and B-Time?
    Journal of Philosophical Research 26 23-36. 2001.
    Clifford Williams has recently argued that the dispute between A- and B-theories, or tensed and tenseless theories of time, is spurious because once the confusions between the two theories are cleared away there is no real metaphysical difference between them. The purpose of this paper is to dispute Williams’s thesis. I argue that there are important metaphysical differences between the two theories and that, moreover, some of the claims that Williams makes in his article suggest that he is symp…Read more
  •  14
    The Disappearance of Time (review)
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (3): 737-740. 1994.
  •  61
    Shoemaker on the duplication argument, survival, and what matters
    Australasian Journal of Philosophy 66 (2): 234-239. 1988.
    This Article does not have an abstract
  •  18
    A reply to Schlesinger
    Philosophical Quarterly 35 (138): 93-94. 1985.
  • Proceedings of the Philosophy of Time Society, 1995-2000 (edited book)
    Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2001.
  •  21
    On the Experience of Tenseless Time
    Journal of Philosophical Research 18 159-166. 1993.
    Defending the tenseless theory of time requires dealing adequately with the experience of temporal becoming. The issue centers on whether the defender of tenseless time can provide an adequate analysis of the presence of experience and the appropriateness of certain of our attitudes toward future and past events. By responding to a recent article, ‘Passage and the Presenee of Experience’, by H. Scott Hestevold, I shall attempt to show that adequate analysis of tenseless time is possible.
  •  215
    McTaggart’s Paradox and Crisp’s Presentism
    Philosophia 38 (2): 229-241. 2010.
    In his review of The Ontology of Time, Thomas Crisp (Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, 2005a ) argues that Oaklander's version of McTaggart's paradox does not make any trouble for his version of presentism. The aim of this paper is to refute that claim by demonstrating that Crisp's version of presentism does indeed succumb to a version of McTaggart's argument. I shall proceed as follows. In Part I I shall explain Crisp's view and then argue in Part II that his analysis of temporal becoming, temp…Read more
  •  166
    The New Theory of Time (edited book)
    Yale Up. 1994.
    The Preface and the General Introduction to the book set the debate within the wider philosophical context and show why the subject of temporal becoming is a perennial concern of science, religion, language, logic, and the philosophy of ...
  •  58
    Does the Russellian Theory of Time Entail Fatalism?
    Modern Schoolman 59 (3): 206-212. 1982.
    Peer Reviewed.
  •  8
    Time and Space, Barry Dainton (review)
    Mind 112 (447): 509-513. 2003.