-
8Faith and freedom : an interfaith perspective / David BurrellPhilosophical Quarterly 56 (225): 632-634. 2006.
-
137What No Eye Has SeenPhilo 6 (2): 263-279. 2003.This paper examines the evidential argument from evil put forward by William Rowe during his early and middle periods (1978-1995). Having delineated some of the important features of Rowe’s argument, it is then assessed in the light of “the skeptical theist critique.” According to skeptical theists, Rowe’s crucial (“noseeum”) inference from inscrutable evil to pointless evil can be exposed as unwarranted, particularly by appealing to the disparity between our cognitive abilities and the infinite…Read more
-
70Skeptical theism and moral skepticism: a reply to Almeida and OppyArs Disputandi: The Online Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4 (4): 1-1. 2012.Skeptical theists purport to undermine evidential arguments from evil by appealing to the fact that our knowledge of goods, evils, and their interconnections is significantly limited. Michael J. Almeida and Graham Oppy have recently argued that skeptical theism is unacceptable because it results in a form of moral skepticism which rejects inferences that play an important role in our ordinary moral reasoning. In this reply to Almeida and Oppy’s argument we offer some reasons for thinking that sk…Read more
-
76Second thoughts on the alleged failure of free will theodiciesSophia 43 (2): 87-93. 2004.In this paper I further the discussion on the adequacy of free will theodicies initiated by Joel Tierno. Tierno’s principal claim is that free will theodicies fail to account for the wide distribution of moral evil. I attempt to show that, even if Tierno need not rely on a compatibilist conception of free will in order to substantiate the aforementioned claim, there remains good reason to think that free will theodicies are not explanatorily inadequate in the way suggested by Tierno.
-
Presence and Absence: The Paintings of Andrew MusgraveLiterature & Aesthetics 18 (2): 189-207. 2008.
-
234Confronting the horror of natural evil: An exchange between Peter Coghlan and Nick TrakakisSophia 45 (2): 5-26. 2006.In this exchange, Peter Coghlan and Nick Trakakis discuss the problem of natural evil in the light of the recent Asian tsunami disaster. The exchange begins with an extract from a newspaper article written by Coghlan on the tsunami, followed by three rounds of replies and counter-replies, and ending with some final comments from Trakakis. While critical of any attempt to show that human life is good overall despite its natural evils, Coghlan argues that instances of natural evil, even horrific o…Read more
Areas of Interest
| Philosophy of Religion |
| 20th Century Philosophy |