Filip Grgic

Institute of Philosophy, Zagreb
  •  39
    Aristotle against the determinist: Metaphysics 6.3
    International Philosophical Quarterly 38 (1998): 127-136. 1998.
    The article tries to show that Aristotle's refutation of causal determinism in Metaph. 6.3 is grounded mainly on two assumptions: a. that there must be a first member of any causal chain, and b. that the origin and the outcome of the chain have to be of equal status.
  • Sextus Empiricus, Against the Logicians
    Rhizai. A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 1 209-213. 2007.
    A review of Sextus Empiricus, Against the Logicians, translated and edited by Richard Bett, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005
  •  18
    Pyrrhonism and Relativism
    Filozofska Istrazivanja 27 (4): 823-841. 2007.
  •  166
    Aristotle's notion of experience
    Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 88 (1): 1-30. 2006.
    Aristotle's notion of experience plays an important role in his epistemology as the link between perception and memory on the one side, and higher cognitive capacities on the other side. However, Aristotle does not say much about it, and what he does say seems inconsistent. Notably, some passages suggest that it is a non-rational capacity, others that it is a rational capacity and that it provides the principles of science. This paper presents a unitary account of experience. It explains how exp…Read more
  •  17
    Method and Metaphysics: Essays in Ancient Philosophy I (review)
    History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (4): 381-383. 2012.
    Jonathan Barnes, Method and Metaphysics: Essays in Ancient Philosophy I, edited by Maddalena Bonelli. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2011. xi + 621 pp. £60.00, $110.00. ISBN 978–0–19–957751–4. Reviewed b...
  •  13
    Aristotle against the Determinist
    International Philosophical Quarterly 38 (2): 127-136. 1998.
  •  83
    Sextus empiricus on the possibility of inquiry
    Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (4): 436-459. 2008.
    Abstract: In this paper I discuss Sextus Empiricus' response to the dogmatists' objection that the skeptics cannot inquire into philosophical theories and at the same time suspend judgment about everything. I argue that his strategy consists in putting the burden of proof on the dogmatists: it is they, and not the skeptics, who must justify the claim to be able to inquire into the nature of things. Sextus' arguments purport to show that if we consider the dogmatists' inquiry, we should conclude …Read more
  •  7
    Pironizam i relativizam
    Filozofska Istrazivanja 27 (4): 823-841. 2007.
  •  17
    Introduction
    Prolegomena 12 (2): 197-197. 2013.