-
39Newton's Classic Deductions from PhenomenaPSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990. 1990.I take Newton's arguments to inverse square centripetal forces from Kepler's harmonic and areal laws to be classic deductions from phenomena. I argue that the theorems backing up these inferences establish systematic dependencies that make the phenomena carry the objective information that the propositions inferred from them hold. A review of the data supporting Kepler's laws indicates that these phenomena are Whewellian colligations-generalizations corresponding to the selection of a best fitti…Read more
-
38Reply to IshamFaith and Philosophy 15 (2): 223-228. 1998.In “On Calling God ‘Mother’” (this journal), I argued that the practice of referring to God exclusively in male terms is morally acceptable. Isham claims that I have argued that “God should be referred to exclusively in male terms.” He claims that the Bible refers to God in female terms. He hints that I may have engaged in “gender devaluation.” He claims that there is a “need for a deity with which women can both relate and identify.” The first of Isham’s claims is simply false. I address the re…Read more
-
37Decisions, Games and Equilibrium SolutionsPSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988. 1988.This paper includes a survey of decision theories directed toward exploring the adequacy of alternative approaches for application to game theoretic reasoning, a review of the classic results of von Neumann and Morgenstern and Nash about equilibrium solutions, an account of a recent challenge to the idea that solutions should be equilibria, and, finally, an explicit reconstruction and defense (using the resources of causal decision theory) of the classic indirect argument for equilibrium solutio…Read more
-
36Kant, Riemann, and Reichenbach on Space and GeometryProceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress 1 423-454. 1995.Classic examples of ostensive geometrical constructions are used to clarify Kant’s account of how they provide knowledge of claims about rigid bodies we can observe and manipulate. It is argued that on Kant’s account claims warranted by ostensive constructions must be limited to scales and tolerances corresponding to our perceptual competencies. This limitation opens the way to view Riemann’s work as contributing valuable conceptual resources for extending geometrical knowledge beyond the bounds…Read more
-
35Howard Stein on Isaac Newton: Beyond hypothesesIn David B. Malament (ed.), Reading Natural Philosophy: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science and Mathematics, Open Court. pp. 71--112. 2002.
-
35Kant on Causality, Freedom, and Objectivity (edited book)Univ of Minnesota Press. 1984.The eight papers in this book are drawn from two conferences that honored Lewis White Beck, an influential Kant scholar.
-
34Do the EPR correlations pose a problem for causal decision theory?Synthese 196 (9): 3711-3722. 2019.We argue that causal decision theory is no worse off than evidential decision theory in handling entanglement, regardless of one’s preferred interpretation of quantum mechanics. In recent works, Ahmed and Ahmed and Caulton : 4315–4352, 2014) have claimed the opposite; we argue that they are mistaken. Bell-type experiments are not instances of Newcomb problems, so CDT and EDT do not diverge in their recommendations. We highlight the fact that a Causal Decision Theorist should take all lawlike cor…Read more
-
33A Sketch of Some Recent Developments in the Theory of ConditionalsJournal of Symbolic Logic 49 (4): 1411-1413. 1984.
-
31A note on universal instantiation in the Stalnaker Thomason conditional logic and M type modal systemsJournal of Philosophical Logic 3 (4). 1974.
-
29Michael Woods. Conditionals. Edited by David Wiggins. Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, etc., 1997, ix + 152 pp. - Dorothy Edgington. Commentary. Therein, pp. 95–137 (review)Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 6 (3): 358-360. 2000.
-
29Isaac Newton's Scientific Method: Turning Data Into Evidence About Gravity and CosmologyOxford University Press UK. 2011.Isaac Newton's Scientific Method examines Newton's argument for universal gravity and his application of it to resolve the problem of deciding between geocentric and heliocentric world systems by measuring masses of the sun and planets. William L. Harper suggests that Newton's inferences from phenomena realize an ideal of empirical success that is richer than prediction. Any theory that can achieve this rich sort of empirical success must not only be able to predict the phenomena it purports to …Read more
-
28Isaac Newton on empirical success and scientific methodIn John Earman & John D. Norton (eds.), The Cosmos of Science: Essays of Exploration, University of Pittsburgh Press. pp. 55--86. 1997.
-
25Causal and Evidential Expectations in Strategic SettingsPhilosophical Topics 21 (1): 79-97. 1993.
-
24Ratifiability and Causal Decision Theory: Comments on Eells and SeidenfeldPSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984. 1984.
-
24Review: Michael Woods, David Wiggins, Conditionals; Dorothy Edgington, Commentary (review)Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 6 (3): 358-360. 2000.
-
24Howard Stein on sophisticated practice of philosophers/scientistsStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 71 196-208. 2020.
-
21Probability and Inference: Essays in Honour of Henry E. Kyburg, Jr (edited book)College Publications. 2007.Recent advances in philosophy, artificial intelligence, mathematical psychology, and the decision sciences have brought a renewed focus to the role and interpretation of probability in theories of uncertain reasoning. Henry E. Kyburg, Jr. has long resisted the now dominate Bayesian approach to the role of probability in scientific inference and practical decision. The sharp contrasts between the Bayesian approach and Kyburg's program offer a uniquely powerful framework within which to study seve…Read more
-
17Newton's MethodologyIn Wayne C. Myrvold & Joy Christian (eds.), Quantum Reality, Relativistic Causality, and Closing the Epistemic Circle, Springer. pp. 43--61. 2009.
-
16Dynamic DeliberationPSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992. 1992.Skyrms' investigations of dynamic deliberation are traced through his book of 1990 and his subsequent investigation of dynamic deliberation based on inductive rules to his recent results about chaos generated by evolutionary game dynamics. It is argued that the dynamics studied in the book, and the inductive dynamics as well, need to be supplemented to yield the correct recommendation in an example game. Some features about information feedback are pointed out. Finally, it is suggested that more…Read more
-
15The Main Business of Natural Philosophy: Isaac Newton's Natural-Philosophical Methodology (review)Isis 104 (3): 614-615. 2013.
-
12Peter Achinstein, Evidence and Method: Scientific Strategies of Isaac Newton and James Clerk Maxwell. New York: Oxford University Press , xv+177 pp. $24.95 (review)Philosophy of Science 81 (4): 684-687. 2014.
-
11Isaac Newton's Scientific Method: Turning Data Into Evidence About Gravity and CosmologyOxford University Press UK. 2011.Isaac Newton's Scientific Method examines Newton's argument for universal gravity and his application of it to resolve the problem of deciding between geocentric and heliocentric world systems by measuring masses of the sun and planets. William L. Harper suggests that Newton's inferences from phenomena realize an ideal of empirical success that is richer than prediction. Any theory that can achieve this rich sort of empirical success must not only be able to predict the phenomena it purports to …Read more
-
11Solutions Based on Ratifiability and Sure Thing ReasoningIn Cristina Bicchieri, Richard C. Jeffrey & Brian Skyrms (eds.), The logic of strategy, Oxford University Press. pp. 67. 1999.
-
6The papers collected here are, with three exceptions, those presented at a conference on probability and causation held at the University of California at Irvine on July 15-19, 1985. The exceptions are that David Freedman and Abner Shimony were not able to contribute the papers that they presented to this volume, and that Clark Glymour who was not able to attend the conference did contribute a paper. We would like to thank the National Science Foundation and the School of Humanities of the Unive…Read more