I am a Doctoral Candidate at Moulay Ismail University (UMI), where I am currently conducting research on the nature of human agency in cyberspace, taking special interest in how an agent in such a realm is capable of making cognitive/moral judgements and act accordingly. I deal with this concern in the light of this basic problematic that can be formulated in the following question: Is it possible to talk about epistemic responsibility without epistemic agency? if yes, then in what sense can we say that being aware of one’s reasons for reasoning, judging, or believing involves a form of agency? Does the fact that one can reflect upon one’s at…
I am a Doctoral Candidate at Moulay Ismail University (UMI), where I am currently conducting research on the nature of human agency in cyberspace, taking special interest in how an agent in such a realm is capable of making cognitive/moral judgements and act accordingly. I deal with this concern in the light of this basic problematic that can be formulated in the following question: Is it possible to talk about epistemic responsibility without epistemic agency? if yes, then in what sense can we say that being aware of one’s reasons for reasoning, judging, or believing involves a form of agency? Does the fact that one can reflect upon one’s attitudes give one any control over one’s attitudes?
My research interest remains in the field of Applied Epistemology. My M.A. dissertation, entitled "Hume's Critique of Causation and its Ethical Implications", explores the relationship between causation and responsibility.
I am aiming for a career in teaching and research in philosophy and humanities, and put my acquired knowledge into practice. I received a full classical education in all the main branches of philosophy, including; history of philosophy and sciences, epistemology, ethics, philosophy of language and religion, political philosophy, and computer science being part of it. I fulfilled my education process by getting universitary diplomas in philosophy and education. Besides, I am a teacher with great communication and listening skills and I am genuinely passionate about the transmission of knowledge with the desire to better support students in difficulty. I conceive the teaching of philosophy as a humanizing act with an unquestionable ethical dimension; humanizing since it’s about making students think and communicate in an effectively critical way. And it is ethical because its failure can lead to misunderstanding its own purpose and then create barriers between students and their own views to the world. For these reasons, it requires a sense of commitment, a motivation-based strategy.
