My philosophical views

Question Answer Comments
A priori knowledge: yes and no Lean toward: yes I clicked only lean toward because it seems to me clear that there are a priori elements in most knowledge but not much knowledge is entirely a priori. Classify my answer as you choose.
Abstract objects: Platonism and nominalism Accept another alternative Wow, here the choice field is seriously deficient.
Aesthetic value: objective and subjective Lean toward: subjective On the basis of absolutely nothing, however.
Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes and no Accept: yes Can't do phil of science without it.
Epistemic justification: internalism and externalism Lean toward: internalism
External world: idealism, skepticism or non-skeptical realism Accept: non-skeptical realism See the previous comment.
Free will: compatibilism, libertarianism or no free will Lean toward: libertarianism But the good lord alone knows. If I could come up with one good new idea about free will, I'd die happy.
God: theism and atheism Accept: atheism There is not the slightest reason to believe in a 'supreme being' of any sort, let alone one who cares about me.
Knowledge: empiricism and rationalism Accept both This is the one silly question so far. Both mind and world are involved and, as Kant already argued, neither can do it alone.
Knowledge claims: contextualism, relativism or invariantism Lean toward: invariantism
Laws of nature: Humean and non-Humean Accept: non-Humean Mechanisms
Logic: classical and non-classical Accept: non-classical
Mental content: internalism and externalism Lean toward: externalism But not about consciousness.
Meta-ethics: moral realism and moral anti-realism Lean toward: moral realism What an ugly, complicated topic!
Metaphilosophy: naturalism and non-naturalism Accept: non-naturalism Naturalism has dick to say about epistemic or moral norms.
Mind: physicalism and non-physicalism Accept: physicalism Duh!
Moral judgment: cognitivism and non-cognitivism Accept: non-cognitivism But this does not mean relativism
Moral motivation: internalism and externalism Insufficiently familiar with the issue
Newcomb's problem: one box and two boxes Insufficiently familiar with the issue
Normative ethics: deontology, consequentialism or virtue ethics Accept more than one All in different contexts.
Perceptual experience: disjunctivism, qualia theory, representationalism or sense-datum theory Accept: representationalism There is a serious alternative? (Not a serious comment. It is getting late and I am getting bored.)
Personal identity: biological view, psychological view or further-fact view Accept: psychological view In a nutshell, memory is so important in such a high proportion of cases.
Politics: communitarianism, egalitarianism or libertarianism Accept: egalitarianism The others are justifications for treating some people savagely.
Proper names: Fregean and Millian Lean toward: Millian
Science: scientific realism and scientific anti-realism Accept: scientific realism I am far from convinced that any serious form of antirealism can even be coherently described.
Teletransporter (new matter): survival and death Lean toward: survival The crucial alternative is missing: As good as survival.
Time: A-theory and B-theory Accept both
Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching, what ought one do?): switch and don't switch Accept: switch
Truth: correspondence, deflationary or epistemic Lean toward: correspondence
Zombies: inconceivable, conceivable but not metaphysically possible or metaphysically possible Accept: inconceivable There is not one good reason to believe that (philosophers') zombies are possible in any way stronger than round squares are possible