My philosophical views

Question Answer Comments
A priori knowledge: yes and no Other Sceptic
Abstract objects: Platonism and nominalism Agnostic/undecided
Aesthetic value: objective and subjective Accept another alternative Subjective-Relativism
Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes and no Agnostic/undecided
Epistemic justification: internalism and externalism Agnostic/undecided
External world: idealism, skepticism or non-skeptical realism Accept: skepticism (and by scepticism I mean the actual sceptical view of 'suspending judgement', not the dogmatic doubt)
Free will: compatibilism, libertarianism or no free will Agnostic/undecided Depends upon the ontology of our actual existence as the beings we are. Without 'knowing' what we are and how we exist, all are just possibilities. However even with 'realism', I believe Compatibilism is more preferable, especially as Determinism offers no more evidence than assuming one branch of an equally possible fork in the road.
God: theism and atheism Other
Knowledge: empiricism and rationalism Accept another alternative Scepticism
Knowledge claims: contextualism, relativism or invariantism Accept another alternative Sceptic
Laws of nature: Humean and non-Humean Lean toward: Humean
Logic: classical and non-classical Lean toward: classical
Mental content: internalism and externalism Lean toward: internalism
Meta-ethics: moral realism and moral anti-realism Accept: moral anti-realism
Metaphilosophy: naturalism and non-naturalism Insufficiently familiar with the issue
Mind: physicalism and non-physicalism Accept: physicalism
Moral judgment: cognitivism and non-cognitivism Agnostic/undecided
Moral motivation: internalism and externalism Agnostic/undecided
Newcomb's problem: one box and two boxes Insufficiently familiar with the issue
Normative ethics: deontology, consequentialism or virtue ethics Agnostic/undecided I believe that each has virtues, however that morality is the product of evolutionary behaviour focused on providing social cohesion and betterment, which has since evolved into more complex forms. Within this all three ethical stances (and others, including Care and Empathy-based theories) occur at times and are rejected at others, due to how our morality has developed.
Perceptual experience: disjunctivism, qualia theory, representationalism or sense-datum theory Accept another alternative Scepticism
Personal identity: biological view, psychological view or further-fact view Accept another alternative Projectivism
Politics: communitarianism, egalitarianism or libertarianism Other Cosmopolitan, anarchism, global community based on empathy, love, and focusing on the other - as the other and for the other.
Proper names: Fregean and Millian Insufficiently familiar with the issue
Science: scientific realism and scientific anti-realism Accept: scientific realism Qua my skeptic leanings I do not dogmatically accept any position, but within the phenomenal realm I lean more towards believing scientific theories established via empirical and reasoned evidence and investigation
Teletransporter (new matter): survival and death Agnostic/undecided
Time: A-theory and B-theory Accept another alternative Either both, or I simply do not believe in time (metaphysically-speaking) - but rather as a projected/mind-dependent concept.
Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching, what ought one do?): switch and don't switch Agnostic/undecided
Truth: correspondence, deflationary or epistemic Accept: correspondence However I do not believe that many things are known. Moreover, many things (e.g. aesthetic value, ethical value, etc) are contextual/relative or a matter of true if one accepts the 'game', rather than true-in-themselves.
Zombies: inconceivable, conceivable but not metaphysically possible or metaphysically possible Accept: metaphysically possible