-
94Review of We Have Never Been Modern by Bruno Latour (review)Philosophy of Science 62 (2): 350-351. 1995.A review of Bruno Latour's "We Have Never Been Modern," characterized as a philosophical study on the world we are living in.
-
76What is explained in science?Philosophy of Science 59 (1): 102-119. 1992.The fundamental problem of what is explained in science should be considered and clarified since it determines the way of solving the problem of how something is explained as well as the entire view of explanation. In the first section after the introduction, Hempel's models of explanation are criticized for their narrow concern with logical reconstruction. In the next section a broader epistemological approach to explanation is presented, and in the last section an historical example of Newtoni…Read more
-
39British Discussion of the Explanation of Science: The Sociological Strong Program versus Philosophical RationalismHybris. Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny 1. 2001.
-
38Marxism as the foundation of philosophies of scienceStudies in Soviet Thought 41 (1): 1-17. 1991.
-
37On the Superiority of the Ordinary Day over the Holy Day: RelativismHybris. Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny 13. 2011.
-
29Replacing Epistemology with a Socio-historical Hermeneutics of Cognition. A Project for Research and TeachingDialogue and Universalism 18 (7-8): 29-41. 2008.I argue that philosophical reflection on cognition and knowledge should not be shaped into an epistemological theory in a strict sense. It ought to be understood as a hermeneutic study of the social and dynamic (historical) nature of cognition
-
29Review of Newton C.A. Da Costa, Steven French, Science and Partial Truth: A Unitary Approach to Models and Scientific Reasoning (review)Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2004 (3). 2004.
-
22Clio meets minerva: Interrelations between history and philosophy of science„Pantaneto Forum”,Http (issue 13). 2002.The idea that science is historical is almost a cliché nowadays. The historical dimensions of science have begun to be appreciated by philosophers of science, for some through the work of Kuhn, and for others through Popper and Lakatos. Does this mean that contemporary philosophy of science understands the historical nature of science? Let me begin with a provocative negative answer. My reason is not the obvious one, namely, that there are several competing models that address the historical dev…Read more
-
17These are the abstracts of papers for the conference, History Unveiled Science Unfettered: A Conference in Celebration of James E. McGuire University of Pittsburgh, January 19, 2002.
-
17The Idea of Rationality of Human Actions in MarxismDialectics and Humanism 11 (2): 373-379. 1984.
-
17Marxism as the Foundation of Philosophies of Science: The Case of G. Lukács' Ontology of Social BeingStudies in Soviet Thought 41 (1): 1-17. 1991.
-
15More Fetters to unfetter: A reply to Depew and SchmausSocial Epistemology 16 (4). 2002.This is a response to two reviews of our book "Science Unfettered: A Philosophical Study of Sociohistorical Ontology." We clarify the relationship between the ontological and the ontic, the key phrases: 'being-in-the-world,' the 'facticity' of human existence. We show where the sources of reviewers misunderstandings lie.
-
13Can relativism be reconciled with realism and causalism?International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (3): 285-294. 1990.Abstract This paper deals with two fundamental assumptions of the Strong programme in the sociology of knowledge and the theoretical (im) possibility of their co?existence with the general relativist tendency of this programme. The first assumption is the realist thesis introduced into the Strong programme through the materialist presupposition that sense experience is reliable and humans are able to learn about the regularities of the non?social world in order to survive. The second assumption …Read more
-
12Science Unfettered: Philosophical Study in Sociohistorical OntologyOhio University Press. 2000.A contribution to ongoing debates in the philosophy of science, aiming to reconceptualize the orientation of the subject. Mobilizing the literature, the authors seek to transform their insights into a new epistemological and ontological basis for studying the enterprise of science.
-
10Can relativism be reconciled with realism and causalism?International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (3). 1990.
-
10Ontologia kulturowa: zarys konstrukcjiDiametros 41 127-151. 2014.My project of cultural ontology aims at a specific modification of Heidegger’s ontology of being, which enables the analysis of historical communal being and the cultural nature of all ways of being. In the first part I shall consider: the motives for using an expression ’cultural ontology,’ arguments for the necessity of overcoming phenomenological analysis toward ontological philosophizing, and reasons for going beyond the analytic of Dasein toward ontological analysis of communities and human…Read more
-
6Ontologia kulturowa: Kulturowość byciaDiametros 42 262-289. 2014.Constructing a cultural ontology I reject the primordiality of everydayness, presupposed by Heidegger, in order to reveal the cultural constitution of all ways of being, from everyday life to the most unusual activities of individuals and communities. The cultural constitution of being is displayed with the help of the idea that meanings, i.e., references, senses and values , are structures of all ways of being. In the following exposition the cultural constitution of being is analyzed in its in…Read more
-
1The Problem of Cognition as an Ontological QuestionActa Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica. Ethica-Aesthetica-Practica 6 31-42. 1988.Punktem wyjścia moich rozważań jest przekonanie, że poznanie nadal wymaga filozoficznego namysłu. Kantowski transcendentalizm i wyrastające z niego bezpośrednio lub pośrednio – filozofie Fichtego, Hegla, Marksa, Nietzschego, Husserla i Heideggera wyznaczają obszar teoretyczny, w którym pytanie o poznanie stawiane jest w nowy sposób, już nie w szacie naturalistycznej czy psychologistycznej. Ze względu na zawartość pojęciową tego obszaru i wypracowany w nim sposób filozofowania, problem poznania s…Read more
-
Do We Really Need an Opposition between A Priori and A Posteriori?Filozofia Nauki 19 (4): 119. 2011.
-
Niearbitralne uwagi o Arbitralności filozofii Józefa NiżnikaPrzeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 34 (2): 207-210. 2000.
-
Kuhnowskie pojęcie paradygmatu a problem opisania rozwoju naukiZagadnienia Naukoznawstwa 23 (1). 1987.
-
Science Unfettered: A Philosophical Study in Sociohistorial OntologyPhilosophy and Rhetoric 40 (4): 438-441. 2001.
-
Marksizm jako fundament filozoficznych koncepcji nauki (na przykładzie ontologii bytu społecznego G. Lukacsa)Studia Filozoficzne 252 (11). 1986.
-
Czy potrzebna nam jest opozycja aprioryczne – aposterioryczne?Filozofia Nauki 19 (4). 2011.I present modifications of the notion of the a priori knowledge (beliefs) or justification executed in the recent epistemological conceptions, and discuss difficulties raised in their empiricist criticisms. Next, I discuss a naturalist and a metaphysical extreme approaches to the a priori , and give arguments against the need for the acceptance of the a priori versus a posteriori opposition. My arguments refer to contemporary philosophical processes: the abandonment of the abstract concept of th…Read more