•  46
    Harm in the Wild: Facing Non-Human Suffering in Nature (review)
    Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (5): 1075-1088. 2013.
    The paper is concerned with whether the reductio of the natural-harm-argument can be avoided by disvaluing non-human suffering and death. According to the natural-harm-argument, alleviating the suffering of non-human animals is not a moral obligation for human beings because such an obligation would also morally prescribe human intervention in nature for the protection of non-human animal interests which, it claims, is absurd. It is possible to avoid the reductio by formulating the moral obligat…Read more