Bing Zhou

Generally believed that "theory of continuing revolution under the dictatorship of the proletariat" is a "Cultural Revolution" guiding ideology, which in ten years the "Cultural Revolution" period has been widely publicized, has written to the Chinese Communists "nine", "Top Ten", "Eleventh large "by the political report and constitution, but also to write the fourth and fifth National People's Congress meeting adopted constitutional changes, the impact is huge. When it was proposed that "the history of Marxism has set a third great milestone," and after more than ten years later, "since the founding of the party on a number of resolutions on the question of history" has made ​​it a completely different assessment that It is the "leftist" errors and this should be "resolutely corrected." In this paper, the editorial "October Socialist Revolution opened up along the path," CPC "nine", Hua Guofeng, the Third Plenum and "since the founding of the party on a number of resolutions on the question of history," as the coordinates of the tracking the fate of its history and study. q "The Theory on Continuing the Revolution under the Leadership of Proletarians" is commonly regarded as the guiding ideology of the Cultural Revolution. Widely publicized during the decade-long Cultural Revolution, it has been incorporated into the Chinese Communist Party's constitution and the People's Republic of China's constitution for numerous times and has exerted a great influence on the state. By the time it was initially proposed in 1967, it was regarded as' the third landmark in the history of Marxism. But it was subject to a completely different fate more than ten years later as it was labeled "pinko" and was required to he "corrected" in Resolution on Certain Questions in the History of Our Party since the Founding of the People's Republic of China. This paper aims to conduct an investigation of the historical fate of "the Theory on Continuing the Revolution under the Dictatorship of Proletarians" with reference to the following texts: Go Ahead Along the Way Inaugurated by October Socialist Revolution, Report of the Ninth National Congress of the CPC, Hua Guofeng's Talkings, Report of the Third Plenary Session of the 11th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and Resolution on Certain Questions in the History of Our Party since the Founding of the People's Republic of China

Smooth transformation of Chinese-style system to adjust the ownership structure from the start, however, non-public economy in the former planned economy period is excluded, then why in the early stages of reform of the ownership structure appears on the direction of 180 ° turn it? Detailed study of history, we can find the ownership structure adjustment and reform is under pressure at the time of employment occurred in 1978-1979, the educated youth back to the city to focus on the already grim employment situation more stressful. In order to solve the unemployment problem, the government put forward the "three combinations" of employment policy, the adaptive behavior of policy adjustments initiated the reform of ownership structure, so that cities and towns to the private economy came into being, the ownership structure of the core of the traditional planning system and the most difficult touch made ​​a breakthrough in the field of reform. This case reflects the smooth start-style economics institutional transformation: a breakthrough in the reform of the principles of choice of maximum pressure along the line of least resistance, to promote principles of reform and the marginal benefit to producers quick spot principle. China's smooth economic institutional transformation was initiated by be adjustment of owning system when the non state owned economy was excluded by the planning economy. Then why the 180 ° turn in the owning system happened in this early stage of China's reformation? A close reading to the history shows that the owning system reform occurred under the pressure of employment when across China the "intellectual youth" pour back to the city form countryside. The new employ policy aiming at preventing the potential social and political crisis hastened the owning system reform which in turn advanced the private owned economy-accidentally the owning system, the hard core of traditional planning economic system accomplished its reformation. The paper holds that the above owning system restructure is a typical case of China's smooth economic institutional transformation

The highest decision-makers utility function of the core objective is to maintain and strengthen the right to rule. This is the actual goal. To this end, they must provide the public with a certain type and quantity of public goods, which constitute its official goal. Moreover, they target for the completion of the formal status of the public can bear to achieve the minimum level of security value, or the regime will be turbulent, so called security goals. To prevent the collapse of the regime at the edge, they exist on the completion of the formal status of the target is higher than the target level of safety motivation, so called for its protection with this goal. However, for each type of public goods in the maintenance of the right to rule in their understanding of the weight, respectively, depending on the game between the public and the highest decision maker's subjective estimates, so two is not always consistent. When the effects of certain public goods are the highest decision-makers ignore the supply index will be zero, that is, in fact the maintenance of the right to rule on the existence of the gap. In addition, the ideological influence of the highest decision-makers and the public the level of public goods and the value of the evaluation, with a halo effect, which makes up the decision-makers on the ideology of control and adjustment to become conducive to maintaining and consolidate the rule of right behavior. The core target of the highest politics policy-makers is to maintain the ruling power and situation. The policy makers should provide a certain kind of public goods for the society and the people which is the key for the stability of the ruling situation, and the lowest level quantity for the society as the security goals, otherwise, the government will be in trouble beyond the lowest level. If the highest policy-maker misjudges the weight of a kind of public goods which is the equilibrium demand in political game of some interest groups, the supply quantity of them will be zero. Then, the ruling situation of the highest policy-maker is unstable. The public's appreciation of the public goods is affected by ideology, and the ideology have halo effects on the stability of ruling situation, which make it useful for the highest policy-maker to regulate and control the ideology

"Marxism in China" is the late 1930s, Mao Zedong clearly a theoretical proposition, a new philosophy will be a preliminary demonstration groups. The interior of this proposition will be explained there is a difference, but the development trend of the argument, then consciously or unconsciously become the name of Mao Zedong is linked with the logic of an integral part of the chain, which is then thought of Mao Zedong is the "Chinese Marxism" conclusions drawn, and the internal logic associated with this are the "Mao Zedong Thought" concept generation, provides a theoretical basis for legitimacy. "Marxism in China," the proposition can be established, and the ideology of China, a variety of subjective and objective factors was the inevitable result, which also reflects the leadership of Mao Zedong's theory of personal wisdom, and the new philosophy will demonstrate group theory contribution. Today continue to use the generated under specific conditions, the proposition of universal significance, should not overlook the true meaning of its original, and to give its universal meaning and times. "Sinification of Marxism" is a theoretical proposition advanced definitely by Mao Zedong in the end of 30's of the 20th century, and the members of Society of New Philosophy demonstrated it firstly and fundamentally. Although the explanations of the members to the proposition are different, the trend of the development of the explanations, consciously or unconsciously, come to be a most important link of the logic chain coupled with Mao Zedong's name. Consequently, the legitimacy foundation of the later coming into being of the conclusion that the thought of Mao Zedong is "Marxism with Chinese Characteristics" and the conception of "Mao Zedong's Thought" logically associating with the conclusion, is provided. That the proposition of "Sinification of Marxism" can come into existence and become a part of China's ideology, is the necessary result of the interaction of many kinds of subjective and objective factors, of which some is the individual theoretical wisdom of Mao Zedong, the chief, and some is the contribution of the theoretical demonstration of the members of the New Philosophy Society. Today, when keeping on using the proposition with common signification, which comes into being in idiographic conditions, we should not neglect its original signification, and ought to endue it with general and timely meanings