• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Bruce Lewenstein

Cornell University
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    14
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    6

 More details
  • Cornell University
    Regular Faculty
University of Pennsylvania
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 1987
Ithaca, New York, United States of America
  • All publications (14)
  •  78
    Scientists and Journalists: Reporting Science as News. Sharon M. Friedman, Sharon Dunwoody, Carol L. Rogers
    Isis 77 (2): 341-342. 1986.
    Media EthicsJournalismSociology of ScienceHistory of Science, Misc
  •  61
    Selling Outer Space: The Kennedy Administration, the Media, and Funding for Project Apollo, 1961-1963. James Lee Kauffman (review)
    Isis 86 (3): 526-526. 1995.
    History of Science
  •  59
    Experimenting with Engagement: Commentary on: Taking Our Own Medicine: On an Experiment in Science Communication
    Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4): 817-821. 2011.
    Social scientists can explore questions about what counts as knowledge and how researchers—including social science researchers—can produce that knowledge. An art/space installation examining issues of public participation in science demonstrates the process of co-creation of knowledge about public participation, not simply the co-creation of the meaning of the installation itself
    Technology EthicsNanotechnology
  •  56
    The Nemesis Affair: A Story of the Death of Dinosaurs and the Ways of Science. David M. Raup
    Isis 78 (1): 99-100. 1987.
    History of Science
  •  44
    Yes, We Have No Neutrons: An Eye-Opening Tour through the Twists and Turns of Bad Science. A. K. Dewdney
    Isis 89 (3): 566-567. 1998.
    History of Science
  •  42
    Robert L. Park. Voodoo Science: The Road from Foolishness to Fraud. x + 230 pp., index. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. $25
    Isis 95 (2): 341-341. 2004.
    History of Science
  •  33
    Mass-Extinction Debates: How Science Works in a Crisis by William Glen (review)
    Isis 86 356-357. 1995.
    History of Science
  •  30
    Cold Fusion: The Scientific Fiasco of the Century by John R. Huizenga; Bad Science: The Short Life and Weird Times of Cold Fusion by Gary Taubes
    Isis 86 144-146. 1995.
    History of Science
  •  29
    Media Science before the Great War by Peter Broks (review)
    Isis 89 362-362. 1998.
    History of Science
  •  28
    Polemic versus History: Reflections on John C. Burnham’s How Superstition Won and Science Lost
    Isis 110 (4): 775-778. 2019.
  •  24
    Was There Really a Popular Science “Boom”?
    Science, Technology, and Human Values 12 (2): 29-41. 1987.
  •  19
    What Counts as a 'Social and Ethical Issue' in Nanotechnology?
    Hyle 11 (1). 2005.
    As 'social and ethical issues' becomes a recurring phrase in the community paying attention to nanotechnology research, a crucial question becomes: what counts as a social and ethical issue? A typical list includes privacy, environmental health and safety, media hype, and other apparently unrelated issues. This article surveys those issues and suggests that concerns about fundamental concepts of ethics, such as fairness, justice, equity, and especially power, unite the various issues identified …Read more
    As 'social and ethical issues' becomes a recurring phrase in the community paying attention to nanotechnology research, a crucial question becomes: what counts as a social and ethical issue? A typical list includes privacy, environmental health and safety, media hype, and other apparently unrelated issues. This article surveys those issues and suggests that concerns about fundamental concepts of ethics, such as fairness, justice, equity, and especially power, unite the various issues identified as 'social and ethical issues' in nanotechnology
    Philosophy of ChemistryApplied EthicsNanotechnology
  •  13
    Do Public Electronic Bulletin Boards Help Create Scientific Knowledge?: The Cold Fusion Case
    Science, Technology and Human Values 20 (2): 123-149. 1995.
    The impact of new technologies on the transformation of information into knowledge is not clear. Especially problematic is the degree to which electronic communication can replace traditional forums in which information is judged and social consensus about its value is achieved. This article uses electronic bulletin boards active during the cold fusion saga that began in 1989 to explore these issues. Dividing the contents of the bulletin boards into big ideas and little ideas, the article sugges…Read more
    The impact of new technologies on the transformation of information into knowledge is not clear. Especially problematic is the degree to which electronic communication can replace traditional forums in which information is judged and social consensus about its value is achieved. This article uses electronic bulletin boards active during the cold fusion saga that began in 1989 to explore these issues. Dividing the contents of the bulletin boards into big ideas and little ideas, the article suggests that only about half of all messages on the boards were big ideas, and only half of those were on technical issues. The study suggests that the substantial volume of irrelevant material and the difficulty of applying extratextual cues to the judgment of information made the bulletin boards an ineffective tool for creating knowledge in this case.
  •  10
    Creating Connections: Museums and the Public Understanding of Current Research
    with David Chittenden and Graham Farmelo
    ALTA MIRA Press. 2004.
    Science museums are in the business of making science accessible to the public--a public constantly bombarded with new information and research results. How the public understands this information will affect what they expect and take away from a museum's exhibits and programs. Creating Connections looks at the public understanding of research (PUR) and how it affects what science museums do. What are the opportunities and critical issues in PUR? What strategies are working and what are some pit…Read more
    Science museums are in the business of making science accessible to the public--a public constantly bombarded with new information and research results. How the public understands this information will affect what they expect and take away from a museum's exhibits and programs. Creating Connections looks at the public understanding of research (PUR) and how it affects what science museums do. What are the opportunities and critical issues in PUR? What strategies are working and what are some pitfalls? What can be learned from the media's experiences with PUR? Creating Connections will be an invaluable resource for science museum professionals who want to guide their institutions and their visitors toward a new understanding of and appreciation for current research.
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback