-
8The Protention-Retention Asymmetry in Husserl’s Conception of Time ConsciousnessPraxis Filosófica 209-229. 2014.In this paper I shall try to clarify Husserl’s conception of time-consciousness. In particular, I try to explain what exactly the asymmetry between protention and retention consists in. I argue (i) that Rodemeyer’s understanding of the protention-retention relationship, as developed, seems misleading, mainly for two reasons: first, it does not take into account that the ‘now’ has duration; second, she conceives the relation between protention and retention as symmetric, (ii) that the asymmetry b…Read more
-
17The irrelevance of poverty for the morality of the lending systemCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 24 (4): 601-615. 2021.
-
6La ética Del default: Por qué algunas deudas no son obligatorias para las generaciones actualesIsonomía. Revista de Teoría y Filosofía Del Derecho 41 119-139. 2014.En este artículo sostengo que muchos países deudores tienen el derecho moral de incurrir en cesación de pagos de sus deudas soberanas. Muestro que deben hacerse excepciones a la afirmación general de que los gobiernos tienen la obligación de devolver préstamos contraídos por gobiernos que le antecedieron.
-
8Debts, Poverty and JusticeEthic@: An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 17 (3). 2018.In this article, I make the idea that poverty outcomes are not necessarily morally relevant for assessing policies as clear as possible by discussing a specific case within the global justice debate: sovereign debts. The claim I would like to defend is that generating poverty among the population of a poor state as a result of a loan is independent from the fact that such debt is morally binding. People might become poorer as a result of a loan, and the loan might still be binding; and people mi…Read more
-
8The irrelevance of poverty for the morality of the lending systemCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1-15. 2019.
-
16New directions in Global Justice: an agent-principal approachEidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 30 48-71. 2019.: There is a puzzling fact about recent discussions on global justice. The debate, as of today, is fairly sophisticated and advanced, and all kinds of views have been defended. However, this debate has often ignored some of the most flagrant injustices of the real world, or is useless to asses them. Consider the following example: currently, the international financial system is set up in such a way that it forces countries to repay their sovereign debts, even if these debts are not morally bind…Read more
-
17Odious Debts and International Fair TradeDaimon: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 76 79-94. 2019.
-
41Odious Debts: A Moral AccountJurisprudence 6 (3): 470-491. 2015.In this article I discuss the conditions under which sovereign debts are not morally binding for a state. Following an old legal doctrine, I call non-binding debts ‘odious'. I proceed as follows. First, I argue that alternative accounts on the morality of debts are unsatisfactory. The problem these accounts have are that they do not clearly identify the philosophical issues that underlie the notion of odious debts, or that they fail to specify what exactly the immorality of odious debts consists…Read more
-
19Rawls y un principio de diferencia globalDianoia 56 (66): 81-104. 2011.En este trabajo me propongo analizar algunos de los argumentos de John Rawls en contra de un principio de diferencia internacional, tal como fueron presentados en Un derecho de gentes. Sostengo que estos argumentos son inconsistentes con el principio de diferencia doméstico. Si los aceptamos, entonces tendremos que afrontar el dilema de o bien tener que aceptar dicho principio distributivo en ambos ámbitos (el doméstico y el internacional) o bien tener que rechazarlo por completo. También sosten…Read more
-
14Dañar a los pobres: hacia una concepción realmente ecuménica de la justicia distributiva internacionalAreté. Revista de Filosofía 25 (2): 337-356. 2013.En este artículo comparo y evalúo críticamente las concepciones sobre la justicia global de Sreenivasan y Pogge. Mientras Sreenivasan sostiene que todas las teorías sobre la justicia global actualmente existentes concuerdan en que los países ricos deberían transferir al menos una porción de sus riquezas a los pobres, Pogge reclama que todas las teorías sobre la justicia global concuerdan en que los países ricos deberían dejar de dañar a los pobres en primer lugar. En este artículo, trataré de mo…Read more
-
97The practical interpretation of the categorical imperative: A defenseIdeas Y Valores 62 (151): 105-113. 2013.The article compares two different interpretations of Kant's categorical imperative −the practical and the logical one− and defends the practical one, arguing that it is superior because it rejects cases of free riding without necessarily rejecting cases of coordination or timing. The logical interpretation, on the other hand, leads to the undesirable outcome that it does not reject immoral cases of free riding, and to the desired outcome that it does not reject maxims of coordination/timing. Gi…Read more
Cristian Dimitriu
Goethe University Of Frankfurt
-
Goethe University Of FrankfurtJustitia AmplificataPostdoctoral Fellow
Toronto, Ontario, Canada