Daniel Kern

Chaffey College
  •  384
    The Logic of Salvation in the Gospel of John
    Philosophy and Theology 27 (1): 171-187. 2015.
    I evaluate two claims; that (a) Jesus’ message as recorded in the gospels implies exclusivism with respect to salvation and that, correspondingly, (b) Christians should be exclusivists with respect to salvation. I evaluate these claims through a cataloguing and evaluation of the logical condition involved in each of the claims regarding conditions for salvation made by Jesus in the Gospel of John. As a result, I argue that (a) is false and that, correspondingly, so is (b).
  •  29
    How We Act (review)
    Review of Metaphysics 59 (2): 418-419. 2005.
    The first chapter of the book is a helpful review of much of the current literature on action theory, focused around the idea of “volition.” Enç’s foil, set out in this chapter, is the existence of “irreducible mental acts”—acts that have no antecedent events as causes—as defended by proponents of agent causation. He claims he can fully account for human action without appeal to such acts.
  •  6
    This dissertation is an investigation into the ground of moral objectivity. My preliminary claim is that in order to be objective, moral properties must be real properties. The following question is, what kind of properties are moral properties? A number of recent philosophers have argued that moral properties are natural properties. ''Natural" in this context means " open to investigation and discovery by the senses or by empirical science." The natural properties proposed in the recent literat…Read more