My philosophical views

Question Answer Comments
A priori knowledge: yes and no Accept: no I know only the present moment.
Abstract objects: Platonism and nominalism Reject both Abstract object as defined in Object Oriented Programming.
Aesthetic value: objective and subjective Reject both Aesthetic value is meaningless to me.
Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes and no Reject both There is no such distinction; it is Kantian.
Epistemic justification: internalism and externalism Reject both My view these words cannot describe. How do you explain the Einstein's four dimensional world.
External world: idealism, skepticism or non-skeptical realism Reject all The world is me. No "isms"
Free will: compatibilism, libertarianism or no free will Reject all I accept causality as stated by Lord Buddha: Four Ariyan Truths.
God: theism and atheism Other No creator God, others I cannot give an answer meaningful to a another.
Knowledge: empiricism and rationalism Other Again no isms
Knowledge claims: contextualism, relativism or invariantism Reject all None of the above. I know what I see provided there is a way to name it;
Laws of nature: Humean and non-Humean Reject both I am talking abaout a compeletely different conception of reality.
Logic: classical and non-classical Accept: classical
Mental content: internalism and externalism Reject both For me, there is no separate mind and matter. I am aware of a MindBody. That is a thing that is living. For example.
Meta-ethics: moral realism and moral anti-realism Reject both Reject isms
Metaphilosophy: naturalism and non-naturalism Reject both No metas either
Mind: physicalism and non-physicalism Reject both MindBody. See previous answer.
Moral judgment: cognitivism and non-cognitivism Reject both Ni isma. The past is dead and the future unborn
Moral motivation: internalism and externalism Accept both What is moral is any action that is good for me and others. [both criteria must be satisfied]
Newcomb's problem: one box and two boxes Reject both There is no box in reality. Is an electron a particle or a wave?
Normative ethics: deontology, consequentialism or virtue ethics Reject all In a 'world' where truth is one, what true is what is right.
Perceptual experience: disjunctivism, qualia theory, representationalism or sense-datum theory Reject all See my previous answers, No 'isms'. There is nothing permanent in this world.
Personal identity: biological view, psychological view or further-fact view Reject all A person is MindBody or NameForm.
Politics: communitarianism, egalitarianism or libertarianism Reject all I strictly keep aways from politics. For me religion is also politics
Proper names: Fregean and Millian Lean toward: Fregean Millian appears to be a typing mistake. Somebody might use Fregean with regard to Frege.
Science: scientific realism and scientific anti-realism Reject both I accept personl observation. Considered to be true only if it is repeatable.
Teletransporter (new matter): survival and death Accept: survival
Time: A-theory and B-theory Reject both Time is not relevant.
Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching, what ought one do?): switch and don't switch The question is too unclear to answer This related, I think right hand/ left hand drive. I would go to closest legal turn.
Truth: correspondence, deflationary or epistemic Other If A makes A statement about the real world to B then if B agrees with it is, assuming both A and B are honest, then the statement is true.
Zombies: inconceivable, conceivable but not metaphysically possible or metaphysically possible The question is too unclear to answer What is the definition of a zombie?