• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Fiorella Battaglia

Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    12
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    4

 More details
  • Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München
    Faculty of Philosophy, Philosophy of Science and Study of Religion
    Other faculty (Postdoc, Visiting, etc)
Homepage
Areas of Interest
Applied Ethics
Meta-Ethics
Normative Ethics
  • All publications (12)
  •  287
    Rethinking Responsibility in Science and Technology (edited book)
    with Nikil Mukerji and Julian Nida-Rümelin
    Pisa University Press. 2014.
    The idea of responsibility is deeply embedded into the “lifeworld” of human beings and not subject to change. However, the empirical circumstances in which we act and ascribe responsibility to one another are subject to change. Science and technology play a great part in this transformation process. Therefore, it is important for us to rethink the idea, the role and the normative standards behind responsibility in a world that is constantly being transformed under the influence of scientific and…Read more
    The idea of responsibility is deeply embedded into the “lifeworld” of human beings and not subject to change. However, the empirical circumstances in which we act and ascribe responsibility to one another are subject to change. Science and technology play a great part in this transformation process. Therefore, it is important for us to rethink the idea, the role and the normative standards behind responsibility in a world that is constantly being transformed under the influence of scientific and technological progress. This volume is a contribution to that joint societal effort.
    Engineering EthicsNormative Ethics, Misc
  •  41
    The embodied self and the feeling of being alive
    In Joerg Fingerhut & Sabine Marienberg (eds.), Feelings of Being Alive / Gefühle des Lebendigseins, De Gruyter. pp. 201-222. 2012.
    This paper aims to render some aspects of the feeling of being alive more clearly comprehensible. My emphasis on the phenomenal quality of consciousness stems from the “embodied” approach to consciousness, according to which consciousness, since it is considered a phenomenon of life, includes both intentional and motivational aspects. In this view, its phenomenal quality is an inherent property of the embodied self, which relates both to the external world and to itself. The feeling of being ali…Read more
    This paper aims to render some aspects of the feeling of being alive more clearly comprehensible. My emphasis on the phenomenal quality of consciousness stems from the “embodied” approach to consciousness, according to which consciousness, since it is considered a phenomenon of life, includes both intentional and motivational aspects. In this view, its phenomenal quality is an inherent property of the embodied self, which relates both to the external world and to itself. The feeling of being alive is not neutral; rather its hedonic character provides orientation in life. Whenever one is living through experience, one has a basis for carrying out one’s own life in the world, biologically, psychologically and ethically. The reflections in this paper follow a systematic approach often combined with a roughly historical perspective.
    Embodiment and Situated CognitionBodily Experience, Misc
  •  20
    RoboLaw: Towards a European framework for robotics regulation
    with Erica Palmerini, Andrea Bertolini, B. J. Koops, Antonio Carnevale, and Pericle Salvini
    Robotics And Autonomous Systems 12 12-24. 2016.
    This paper intends to sum up the main findings of the European project RoboLaw. In this paper, the authors claim that the European Union should play a pro-active policy role in the regulation of technologies so as to inform the development of technologies with its values and principles. The paper provides an explication of the rationale for analysing of a limited and heterogeneous number of robotics applications. For these applications, the following issues are addressed: whether robotics deserv…Read more
    This paper intends to sum up the main findings of the European project RoboLaw. In this paper, the authors claim that the European Union should play a pro-active policy role in the regulation of technologies so as to inform the development of technologies with its values and principles. The paper provides an explication of the rationale for analysing of a limited and heterogeneous number of robotics applications. For these applications, the following issues are addressed: whether robotics deserve a special case of regulation; the direct and indirect role ethics can play in regulating technology; the transformations of both vulnerabilities and capabilities, and the effects of liability law in favouring the socially relevant applications. In conclusion, a reflection on the possibility to generalize some of the RoboLaw findings to other technologies is proposed, with respect to liability and ethics.
    Robot Ethics
  •  20
    Computers for everyone: Elizabeth R. Petrick: Making computers accessible: disability rights and digital technologies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2015, 208pp, $49.95 HB (review)
    Metascience 25 (2): 279-280. 2016.
    Can Machines Think?
  •  4
    Phänomenales Bewusstsein bei Kant
    In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010, De Gruyter. pp. 367-378. 2013.
    Kant: Philosophy of Mind
  •  4
    Science, technology, and responsibility (edited book)
    with Nikil Mukerji and Julian Nida-Rümelin
    Pisa University Press. 2014.
    The empirical circumstances in which human beings ascribe responsibility to one another are subject to change. Science and technology play a great part in this transformation process. Therefore, it is important for us to rethink the idea, the role and the normative standards behind responsibility in a world that is constantly changing under the influence of scientific and technological progress. This volume is a contribution to that joint societal effort.
    Engineering EthicsPhilosophy of Technology, MiscComputer Ethics, MiscBiotechnology EthicsMachine Eth…Read more
    Engineering EthicsPhilosophy of Technology, MiscComputer Ethics, MiscBiotechnology EthicsMachine Ethics
  •  3
    Basic issues of ethics in robotics
    In Roboethics in Film, Pisa University Press. 2014.
    Moral Epistemology, MiscRobot Ethics
  •  3
    Nuovi libri
    Rivista di Filosofia 102 (1). 2011.
    Hellenistic and Later Ancient Philosophy, Misc
  •  2
    Roboethics in Film (edited book)
    with Natalie Weidenfeld
    Pisa University Press. 2014.
    Film MediaRobot Ethics
  •  1
    Guidelines on Regulating Robotics
    with Erica Palmerini, Federico Azzarri, Andrea Bertolini, Antonio Carnevale, Jacopo Carpaneto, Filippo Cavallo, Angela Di Carlo, Marco Cempini, Marco Controzzi, Bert-Jaap Koops, Federica Lucivero, Nikil Mukerji, Luca Nocco, Alberto Pirni, and Huma Shah
    Robolaw (FP7 project). 2014.
    Philosophy of Technology, MiscMachine EthicsEngineering EthicsRoboticsTechnology Ethics, MiscRobot E…Read more
    Philosophy of Technology, MiscMachine EthicsEngineering EthicsRoboticsTechnology Ethics, MiscRobot Ethics
  • Technikethik
    with Nikil Mukerji
    In Julian Nida-Rümelin, Irina Spiegel & Markus Tiedemann (eds.), Handbuch Philosophie und Ethik - Band 2: Disziplinen und Themen, Utb. pp. 288-295. 2015.
    Machine EthicsEngineering EthicsBiotechnology EthicsTechnology Ethics, MiscPhilosophy of Technology,…Read more
    Machine EthicsEngineering EthicsBiotechnology EthicsTechnology Ethics, MiscPhilosophy of Technology, Misc
  • Memoria: Fra Neurobiologia Identità Etica
    with Micaela Morelli, Alberto Oliverio, Riccardo Manzotti, Simona Argentieri, and Anna Donise
    Mimesis. 2010.
    Within a general approach that implies the closely related survey of neurosciences and philosophical thought, the essays collected in the volume develop two main lines of research. The first one, thanks to the contributions of scientists and psychologists , psychoanalysists and bioengineers , allows to fix the attention on the neurobiological, psychological, psychoanalytical and physical remembering. The second one, more specifically philosophical, is declined in three different approaches. the …Read more
    Within a general approach that implies the closely related survey of neurosciences and philosophical thought, the essays collected in the volume develop two main lines of research. The first one, thanks to the contributions of scientists and psychologists , psychoanalysists and bioengineers , allows to fix the attention on the neurobiological, psychological, psychoanalytical and physical remembering. The second one, more specifically philosophical, is declined in three different approaches. the first - with essays by Stefania Achella, Giuseppe D'Anna and Rosario Diana - points to the anlysis of the role played by the rememberance and the prefiguration in the processes of identity construction. The second - with contributions from Fiorella Battaglia, Anna Donise, Sabine Marienberg and Sara Fortuna - focuses on the role of remembering in anthropology and linguistics, as well as the identification of certain diseases of memory. The third, finally - with contributions from Gabriella Baptist, Chiara de Luzenberger and Marco Boninu - tends to define the regulatory function of memory
    Theories of Memory
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback