•  1
    In Defense of Hume’s Skeptical Argument against Induction
    Cheolhak-Korean Journal of Philosophy 123 153. 2015.
    흄이 귀납에 대한 강력한 회의주의적 논변을 제시한 것은 잘 알려져 있다. 많은 철학자들은 흄의 귀납에 대한 기술이 비록 어떤 면에서는 부적합 할지라도, 그의 회의적 논변 자체는 여전히 반박 불가능한 것이라 생각한다. 하지만 오카샤는 이것이 옳지 않다고 주장한다: 일단 우리가 귀납을 적합하게 기술한다면, 흄의 논변은 이러한 귀납에 대한 적합한 기술에는 더이상 적용될 수 없다. 이 논문에서, 나는 오카샤에 반대하여, 흄의 회의적 논변이 귀납에 대한 적절한 기술 하에서도 여전히 적용될 수 있음을 논변할 것이다.
  •  28
    Singular thoughts, singular attitude reports, and acquaintance
    Analytic Philosophy 64 (2): 126-142. 2023.
    It is widely accepted among philosophers that there is a tension between acquaintance constraints on singular thought and the plausible assumption that the truths of singular attitude reports ensure the subject's having singular thoughts. From this, anti-acquaintance theorists contend that acquaintance constraints must be rejected. As a response, many acquaintance theorists maintain that there is good reason to doubt a strong connection between singular attitude reports and singular thoughts. In…Read more
  •  28
    The primary aim of this paper is to provide the exact diagnosis of the contingent a priori debate so far by untangling complicated issues surrounding it, such as singular thought, linguistic stipulation, and epistemic justification. I will first maintain that most philosophers' arguments for or against the contingent a priori are ultimately based on one of two conflicting intuitions about linguistic stipulation: sceptics of the contingent a priori have appealed to the intuition that extra-lingui…Read more
  •  4
    Upcycled vs. Conventional: Food product preference assessment using optical brain monitoring
    with Siddharth Bhatt, Jonathan Deutsch, Benjamin Fulton, Rajneesh Suri, and Hasan Ayaz
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12. 2018.