| Question |
Answer |
Comments |
| A priori knowledge: yes and no |
Skip |
|
| Abstract objects: Platonism and nominalism |
Lean toward: nominalism |
|
| Aesthetic value: objective and subjective |
Accept both |
not all the questions can be answered by the style of neither nor |
| Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes and no |
Lean toward: yes |
this is a crying baby, but we have to rock it |
| Epistemic justification: internalism and externalism |
Lean toward: internalism |
|
| External world: idealism, skepticism or non-skeptical realism |
Accept: skepticism |
proof!proof!proof! |
| Free will: compatibilism, libertarianism or no free will |
Lean toward: libertarianism |
frankly speaking,I'm not familiar with the theories of free will. |
| God: theism and atheism |
Accept: atheism |
were there a God, it must be yourself, your power |
| Knowledge: empiricism and rationalism |
Lean toward: empiricism |
fans of Hume |
| Knowledge claims: contextualism, relativism or invariantism |
Lean toward: contextualism |
the basic idea of contextualism is very plausible,that's what i can only say |
| Laws of nature: Humean and non-Humean |
Lean toward: Humean |
it sound more philosophical :) |
| Logic: classical and non-classical |
Lean toward: non-classical |
although i'm ont good at the skill of logic, i just don't believe the simpleness of Two-Valued |
| Mental content: internalism and externalism |
Lean toward: internalism |
it also can be regarded as the problem of semantics? |
| Meta-ethics: moral realism and moral anti-realism |
Lean toward: moral anti-realism |
|
| Metaphilosophy: naturalism and non-naturalism |
Lean toward: non-naturalism |
natualism,the production of lazy |
| Mind: physicalism and non-physicalism |
Lean toward: non-physicalism |
non-physicalism, it's not easy to say love. we need more evidences or proofs. |
| Moral judgment: cognitivism and non-cognitivism |
Skip |
|
| Moral motivation: internalism and externalism |
Lean toward: internalism |
|
| Newcomb's problem: one box and two boxes |
Reject both |
do not take any box not belongs to you! |
| Normative ethics: deontology, consequentialism or virtue ethics |
Skip |
|
| Perceptual experience: disjunctivism, qualia theory, representationalism or sense-datum theory |
Accept: qualia theory |
it's the last position of non-physicalism? |
| Personal identity: biological view, psychological view or further-fact view |
Skip |
|
| Politics: communitarianism, egalitarianism or libertarianism |
Lean toward: libertarianism |
there no such things like egality |
| Proper names: Fregean and Millian |
Accept: Fregean |
the debate is amazing and puzzling |
| Science: scientific realism and scientific anti-realism |
Lean toward: scientific anti-realism |
|
| Teletransporter (new matter): survival and death |
Skip |
|
| Time: A-theory and B-theory |
Skip |
|
| Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching, what ought one do?): switch and don't switch |
Reject both |
cruel to make a choice. do there are something we call normative? |
| Truth: correspondence, deflationary or epistemic |
Lean toward: epistemic |
although the deflationism sounds plausible,I don't think it works. Neverthless truth is something always involeving epistemic |
| Zombies: inconceivable, conceivable but not metaphysically possible or metaphysically possible |
Lean toward: metaphysically possible |
i'm very interesting in the problem of philosophical zombies,especially the thesis of conceivability and possibility |
