•  10
    According to the most recent articulation of her view, Marilyn Adams’s reply to the problem of horrendous evils states that God offers compensation to those who experience horrendous evils. This compensation includes the good of the incarnation of God and the good of identification with God in virtue of suffering horrendous evils. Andrew Gleeson has raised a series of objections to Adams’s recent articulation. I argue that all of Gleeson’s arguments fail or fail to pose a distinct challenge. I t…Read more
  •  14
    Debunking and fully apt belief
    Filosofia Unisinos 19 (3). 2018.
  •  3
    The Realm of Reason
    Philosophia Christi 8 (1): 169-172. 2006.
  •  18
    Animals with Soul
    Sophia 57 (1): 85-101. 2018.
    I argue that ensouled animalism—the view that we are identical to animals that have immaterial souls as parts—has a pair of advantages over its two nearest rivals, materialistic animalism and pure dualism. Contra pure dualism, ensouled animalism can explain how physical predications can be literally true of us. Contra materialistic animalism, ensouled animalism can explain how animals can survive death. Furthermore, ensouled animalism has these advantages without creating any problems beyond tho…Read more
  •  8
    Finding Collective Sin and Recompense in Anselm’s Cur Deus Homo
    American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 91 (3): 431-446. 2017.
    Anselm’s argument in Cur Deus Homo commits him to the existence of collective sin and to Jesus’s offering recompense for the human race’s collective sin. By “collective sin” I mean sin of a collective entity—in this case, the human race. In the bulk of this paper I argue that one of Anselm’s defenses of a crucial assumption of his argument—what I call Anselm’s Principle—can succeed only on the assumption that Jesus offers recompense for the collective sin of the human race. At the end of the pap…Read more
  •  10
  •  5
    Christian Philosophical Theology (review)
    Faith and Philosophy 25 (1): 113-116. 2008.
  •  136
    The a priori defended: a defense of the generality argument
    Philosophical Studies 146 (2): 273-289. 2008.
    One of Laurence BonJour’s main arguments for the existence of the a priori is an argument that a priori justification is indispensable for making inferences from experience to conclusions that go beyond experience. This argument has recently come under heavy fire from Albert Casullo, who has dubbed BonJour’s argument, “The Generality Argument.” In this paper I (i) defend the Generality Argument against Casullo’s criticisms, and (ii) develop a new, more plausible, version of the Generality Argume…Read more
  •  56
    Experientially defeasible a priori justification
    Philosophical Quarterly 56 (225). 2006.
    In his recent book Albert Casullo rejects the claim that if a belief is defeasible by non-experiential evidence then it is defeasible by experiential evidence. This claim is a crucial premise in a simple argument for the experiential defeasibility of a priori justification. I defend the premise against Casullo's objection, the main problem with which is that he does not take into account the evidential role of multiple corroborating sources of testimony. I conclude that the crucial premise is tr…Read more
  •  44
    Atoning in purgatory
    Religious Studies 53 (2): 217-237. 2017.
  • Communal Substitutionary Atonement
    Journal of Analytic Theology 3 47-69. 2015.
    In this paper I develop and defend a new theory of the Atonement - the Communal Substitution Theory. According to the Communal Substitution Theory, by dying on the cross Jesus either takes on the punishment for, or offers satisfaction for, the sins of the human community. Individual humans have sinned, but human communities have sinned as well. Jesus dies for the communal sins. As a result, human communities are forgiven and reconciled to God, and through the event of communal forgiveness, i…Read more
  •  11
    Evolutionary Religion (review)
    International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 6 (4). 2016.
    _ Source: _Page Count 4
  •  23
    Evolutionary Religion, written by J. L. Schellenberg
    International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 6 (4): 418-421. 2016.
    _ Source: _Page Count 4
  • Book Review (review)
    Philosophia Christi 8 (1): 169-171. 2006.
  •  243
    The last 15 years or so has seen the development of a fascinating new area of cognitive science: the cognitive science of religion (CSR). Scientists in this field aim to explain religious beliefs and various other religious human activities by appeal to basic cognitive structures that all humans possess. The CSR scientific theories raise an interesting philosophical question: do they somehow show that religious belief, more specifically belief in a god of some kind, is irrational? In this paper …Read more
  •  123
    Paul Benacerraf’s argument that mathematical realism is apparently incompatible with mathematical knowledge has been widely thought to also show that a priori knowledge in general is problematic. Although many philosophers have rejected Benacerraf’s argument because it assumes a causal theory of knowledge, some maintain that Benacerraf nevertheless put his finger on a genuine problem, even though he didn’t state the problem in its most challenging form. After diagnosing what went wrong with Bena…Read more
  •  15
    Intuition Theory of the A Priori, with Implications for Experimental Philosophy
    In Albert Casullo & Joshua C. Thurow (eds.), The a Priori in Philosophy, Oxford University Press. pp. 67. 2013.
  •  42
    Christian philosophical theology (review)
    Faith and Philosophy 25 (1): 113-116. 2008.
  •  1
  •  324
    Moral Intuitionism Defeated?
    American Philosophical Quarterly 50 (4): 411-422. 2013.
    Walter Sinnott-Armstrong has developed and progressively refined an argument against moral intuitionism—the view on which some moral beliefs enjoy non-inferential justification. He has stated his argument in a few different forms, but the basic idea is straightforward. To start with, Sinnott-Armstrong highlights facts relevant to the truth of moral beliefs: such beliefs are sometimes biased, influenced by various irrelevant factors, and often subject to disagreement. Given these facts, Sinnott-A…Read more