Juris Bogdanovs

This philosophical hypothesis is based on actual facts and logically possible interactions between several entities, leading to the phenomenon called ‘gravitational attraction. All current theories and hypotheses rely primarily on theoretical ideas about how gravitational attraction functions but fail to explain all its aspects, including the connection between gravity and the quantum world. This is why the question of gravity remains unresolved to this day. A solid philosophical foundation is needed to identify the most likely causes and mechanisms behind gravitational attraction. Understanding gravity correctly is of pivotal importance if we hope to comprehend the possibility of antigravity and its potential mechanisms. This work addresses all these questions and more. The hypothesis in this document regarding gravity is based on exploring all involved entities and the mutual interactions between them that could be responsible for the emergence of the phenomenon we call ‘gravitational attraction.’ The subjects involved in this system are as follows: 1) Earth’s magnetism, 2) the paramagnetic properties of oxygen, and 3) the electric charge of all objects. This hypothesis is intended to address dilemmas that current theories fail to explain. These dilemmas are as follows: 1) Why is gravity such a weak force? 2) Why does gravity only attract, especially in comparison to magnetism? 3) How does gravity attract non-magnetic objects In essence, according to this hypothesis, the effect of gravitational attraction might be directly linked to Earth's magnetism or magnetic field, even though objects—especially non-magnetic substances—are not directly attracted by it. Instead, all objects are attracted because of Earth's magnetic field influencing oxygen. The attraction of all objects on Earth, including non-magnetic ones, occurs because all substances possess a certain electric (or electromagnetic) charge. This charge, within a certain proximity to these charged objects and substances, affects the charge of oxygen, in addition to the electromagnetic charge already imposed on them by Earth. In this way, all objects form a field of more strongly charged paramagnetic oxygen particles around themselves. It is this field that is pulled more strongly toward Earth, dragging along the object responsible for the enhanced electromagnetic charge of this field. This means that gravitational attraction results from Earth's magnetic field in combination with the interactions between the properties of oxygen and the involved objects. This hypothesis about gravity also helps explain how and why planes fly, including the dilemma of why the air above an airplane’s wings moves faster than expected. It also accounts for why all objects are so easily lifted into the air during strong winds. Within existing theories of gravity, antigravity is impossible to explain, let alone achieve. This hypothesis provides an easy-to-understand mechanism for antigravity systems, provided its core assumptions are correct. The claims of this hypothesis can be scientifically tested. This work provides ideas for these tests.

There is an undeniable link between overpopulation and climate change. Overpopulation is dangerous in its own right, and the facts about the current state of affairs are truly terrifying, yet heavily overlooked and underreported. Overpopulation has led to—and continues to accelerate—deforestation. The scale of deforestation is also overlooked and heavily underreported, as is the critical role of forests in ecosystems, including their influence on healthy rain patterns. Changes in rain patterns are among the most dangerous consequences of climate change, which will lead to shortages of drinking water in the foreseeable future all over the world. This, too, will be caused by deforestation, as the facts confirm. This article will explain how deforestation has caused shifts in humidity, directly contributing to the severity and frequency of droughts and floods. Additionally, changes in relative humidity are responsible for higher temperatures and the shrinking of glaciers and polar ice caps. These water reservoirs are diminishing not only because they are melting but also because they are drying out—all as a consequence of altered humidity. This shift in humidity has led to a seemingly absurd paradox: on one hand, the air is becoming drier; on the other hand, the total amount of water in the atmosphere is increasing. Scientists have been ignoring the causes and consequences of this paradox for many years. All of this has been directly influenced by deforestation, which, in turn, has been driven by the growing number of humans on this planet. We have far exceeded sustainable population levels. Another problem that exacerbates all issues related to climate change is human intervention in the climate through various weather engineering methods, often referred to as geoengineering. These methods include cloud seeding, CO2 capture, and others. They all worsen the situation, and humans fail to realize this, largely because we have ignored the enormous role of humidity levels in our ecosystems—particularly their impact on rain patterns. All of this is a consequence of deforestation. The solutions to climate problems lie in afforestation and global depopulation. These measures are relatively easier and faster to implement. Unfortunately, for them to succeed, humankind must first acknowledge these issues as the real causes of climate change and act swiftly, especially since deforestation continues unabated. We are in danger of having wasted time meant to save our planet by barking up the wrong tree—CO2 emissions. We are losing essential time. We cannot afford to be a society that "doesn’t look up!" The facts in this article are undeniable. The problem is deforestation, which is caused by overpopulation. Let the facts speak!

There are several observations related to magnetism and magnetic fields that the current model of magnetic field patterns fails to explain. However, the alternative model proposed by this hypothesis accounts for these observations comprehensively. Furthermore, the current model cannot adequately explain how or why magnetic attraction and repulsion occur; in fact, it raises more questions than it answers. In contrast, the magnetic field pattern proposed by this hypothesis resolves these issues without introducing inconsistencies or additional dilemmas, while also addressing everything the currently accepted model claims to explain. The entire concept of this hypothesis originated from patterns created by magnets on ferrocells. Until now, science has largely dismissed these patterns as insignificant. However, the interactions revealed by magnets on ferrocells are both fascinating and specific. These interactions suggest that the patterns are not merely decorative but are, in fact, non-random. A model based on these magnetic fields can explain all observations related to magnetism, including magnetism itself. Unfortunately, the scientific community has yet to show interest in these findings. One aspect that the current model of magnetic fields fails to explain is the spikes formed in ferrofluid. Another unresolved question concerns the patterns produced by magnetic fields on ferrocells. Additionally, the direction of magnetism—depicted as moving from north to south—is problematic. Not only is there no evidence to support this directional assumption, but it also creates a dilemma: how can magnets repel each other when their south poles or north poles are brought together? Another major flaw of the currently accepted model is its inability to explain the mechanics of magnetic attraction and repulsion. All of these unanswered questions are addressed by this hypothesis, which offers an alternative pattern of magnetic fields.

Distances to stars have remained a complete mystery for a very long time—and for good reason. Today, we are told that these distances, along with the size of the Universe itself, have been measured. But have they, really? This work invites you to stay true to your scientific spirit—if you have one—and to keep your mind open. Step by step, you will be guided through all the key factors involved in determining stellar distances. Many of the facts may seem familiar, yet you might be surprised by how much has been overlooked or misunderstood. Here, the Law of Distance/Size Correlation will be explained, consisting of the Inverse Square Law and the Inverse Proportional Law. Together, these laws create a serious conflict: if the currently accepted ratios of size and distance are correct, then it should be impossible for many stars to be visible at all. We will also examine the Parallax Angle, which also follows the Inverse Proportional Law and introduces a significant potential for error—leading to wildly exaggerated distance estimates, for very clear reasons. The brightness of stars causes them to appear larger on our detection instruments. Yet, the difference between expected and observed results often reaches factors of hundreds of thousands—far too large to accept without serious scrutiny. All in all, the hypothesis presented in this document argues for much shorter distances to the stars, and accordingly, a much smaller galaxy and Universe. In fact, data from the Voyager 1 and New Horizons space probes indirectly support this view, suggesting that actual distances may be tens or even hundreds of thousands of times shorter. The facts are clear—and striking. If this hypothesis is correct, it could open the door to a future where interstellar travel is no longer a fantasy. Let the facts determine what is—and isn’t—possible. Keep your mind open.