-
492Subatomic Inferences: An Inferentialist Semantics for Atomics, Predicates, and NamesReview of Symbolic Logic 1-28. 2021.Inferentialism is a theory in the philosophy of language which claims that the meanings of expressions are constituted by inferential roles or relations. Instead of a traditional model-theoretic semantics, it naturally lends itself to a proof-theoretic semantics, where meaning is understood in terms of inference rules with a proof system. Most work in proof-theoretic semantics has focused on logical constants, with comparatively little work on the semantics of non-logical vocabulary. Drawing on …Read more
-
292Imperative BilateralismIn Martin Blicha & Igor Sedlár (eds.), The Logica Yearbook 2020, College Publications. pp. 237-252. 2021.This paper provides a proof-theoretic account of imperative logical consequence by generalising Greg Restall’s multiple conclusion bilateralism for declarative logic. According to imperative bilateralism, a sequent Γ ⊢ Δ is valid iff jointly commanding all the imperatives Φ ∈ Γ and prohibiting all the imperatives Ψ ∈ Δ clashes. This account has three main virtues: (1) it provides a proof-theoretic account of imperatives; (2) it does not rely on the controversial notion of imperative inference; a…Read more
-
171Scorekeeping trollsThought: A Journal of Philosophy 9 (3): 215-224. 2020.Keith DeRose defends contextualism: the view that the truth-conditions of knowledge ascriptions vary with the context of the ascriber. Mark Richard has criticised contextualism for being unable to vindicate intuitions about disagreement. To account for these intuitions, DeRose has proposed truth-conditions for “knows” called the Gap view. According to this view, knowledge ascriptions are true iff the epistemic standards of each conversational participant are met, false iff each participant's sta…Read more
-
112Revision, endorsement and the analysis of meaningAnalysis 80 (4): 693-704. 2020.Recently there has been much philosophical interest in the analysis of concepts to determine whether they should be removed, revised, or replaced. Enquiry of this kind is referred to as conceptual engineering or conceptual ethics. We will call it revisionary conceptual analysis (RCA). It standardly involves describing the meaning of a concept, evaluating whether it serves its purposes, and prescribing what it should mean. However, this stands in tension with prescriptivism, a metasemantic view w…Read more
-
73Whose Uptake Matters? Sexual Refusal and the Ethics of UptakePhilosophical Quarterly. 2024.What role does audience uptake play in determining whether a speaker refuses or consents to sex? Proponents of constitution theories of uptake argue that which speech act someone performs is largely determined by their addressee’s uptake. However, this appears to entail a troubling result: a speaker might be made to perform a speech act of sexual consent against her will. In response, we develop a social constitution theory of uptake. We argue that addressee uptake can constitute a speaker’s utt…Read more
-
44Subatomic Inferences: An Inferentialist Semantics for Atomics, Predicates, and NamesReview of Symbolic Logic 16 (3): 672-699. 2023.Inferentialism is a theory in the philosophy of language which claims that the meanings of expressions are constituted by inferential roles or relations. Instead of a traditional model-theoretic semantics, it naturally lends itself to a proof-theoretic semantics, where meaning is understood in terms of inference rules with a proof system. Most work in proof-theoretic semantics has focused on logical constants, with comparatively little work on the semantics of non-logical vocabulary. Drawing on …Read more
-
University of MelbourneSchool of Historical And Philosophical StudiesTeaching Associate (Periodic) (Part-time)
-
Monash University
PhD, 2022
Parkville, Victoria, Australia