•  13
    Puntos de vista científicos en las series de televisión
    Daimon: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 75. 2018.
  •  4
    The ethics of emissions accounting deals with the following question: When considering who has emitted how much, should emissions be attributed to producers (production-based emissions accounting,...
  •  12
    Climate scientists have proposed two methods to link extreme weather events and anthropogenic climate forcing: the probabilistic and the storyline approach. Proponents of the first approach have raised the criticism that the storyline approach could be overstating the role of anthropogenic climate change. This issue has important implications because, in certain contexts, decision-makers might seek to avoid information that overstates the effects of anthropogenic climate change. In this paper, w…Read more
  •  690
    Moral Responsibility for Climate Change Loss and Damage: A response to the Excusable Ignorance Objection
    Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 1 (39): 7-24. 2020.
    The Polluter Pays Principle (PPP) states that polluters should bear the burdens as- sociated with their pollution. This principle has been highly contested because of the pu- tative impossibility of considering individuals morally responsible for an important amount of their emissions. For the PPP faces the so-called excusable ignorance objec- tion, which states that polluters were for a long time non-negligently ignorant about the negative consequences of greenhouse gas emissions and, thus, can…Read more
  •  21
    Political Responsibility Refocused: Thinking Justice after Iris Marion Young
    Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (3): 351-354. 2015.
    One of the most significant challenges that twenty-first-century philosophy has to face is to think about our moral and political responsibility in collective and global contexts. In our globalized...
  •  15
    Introduction to the Special Issue on Individual Environmental Responsibility
    with Lieske Voget-Kleschin and Christian Baatz
    Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 32 (4): 493-504. 2019.
    Human beings are the cause of many current environmental problems. This poses the question of how to respond to these problems at the national and international level. However, many people ask themselves whether they should personally contribute to solving these problems and how they could (best) do so. This is the focus of this Special Issue on Individual Environmental Responsibility. The introduction proposes a way to structure this complex debate by distinguishing three broad clusters of argu…Read more
  •  18
    . Two Mutually Exclusive Concepts of Harm? Retrospective and Structural Wrongful Harm at the Bases of a Compensatory-Based Approach for Loss and Damage. Ethics, Policy & Environment: Vol. 21, Geoengineering, Political Legitimacy and Justice, Guest Edited by Stephen Gardiner and Augustin Fragnière, pp. 391-395.
  •  35
    Climate change involves changes in the climate system caused by polluting human activities and the social and natural effects of these changes. The historical and anthropogenic grounds of climate change play an important role in climate justice claims. Many climate justice scholars believe that principles of climate justice should account for the historical and anthropogenic sources of climate change. Two main backward-looking principles have been proposed: the polluter pays principle (PPP) and …Read more
  •  17
    Individual Compensatory Duties for Historical Emissions and the Dead-Polluters Objection
    Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 32 (4): 591-609. 2019.
    Debates about individual responsibility for climate change revolve mainly around individual mitigation duties. Mitigation duties concern future impacts of climate change. Unfortunately, climate change has already caused important harms and it is foreseeable that it will cause more in the future, in spite of our best efforts. Thus, arguably, individuals might also have duties related to those harms. In this paper, I address the question of whether individuals are obligated to provide compensation…Read more
  •  15
    Our Responsibility to Future Generations in the Context of Ecological Crisis
    American Journal of Semiotics 33 (1/2): 99-112. 2017.
    The present article aims to present how the different philosophical perspectives have tackled the problem of the foundations of our responsibility to future generations in the context of ecological crisis. The main theories addressed here will be Hans Jonas metaphysical foundation, utilitarianism, communitarianism, the rights theory and contractarian perspectives derived from John Rawls’s theory. By assessing these perspectives, I assert that, against jonasianianism and related perspectives, our…Read more