Mark Hebert

I examine three accounts of integrity and argue that each fails to provide an adequate analysis of the type of commitments needed for integrity. I argue that unless one is committed to some principle or project primarily because one judges it to be valuable independent of oneself, such a commitment cannot ground one's integrity. While the inclusion of this independence criterion does not eliminate the immoral as possible possessors of integrity, it does rule out those whose primary motivation for acting upon and maintaining a given commitment is the satisfaction of desire. It also explains why integrity and morality seem so well-suited , and the sense of selflessness found in persons of integrity