• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Michael Robinson

  •  Home
  •  Publications
    5
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates

 More details
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Religion
17th/18th Century Philosophy
  • All publications (5)
  •  12
    Kant-Studien, Begründet von Hans Vaihinger; neubegründet von Paul Menzer und Gottfried Martin
    with Mainz Funke, M. Lauth, F. Bern, Rocca La, Brandt , Schulze , Bondeli , Dancy , Plerobon , and Chenet
    Kant Studien 87 (4): 385. 1996.
    Kant: CategoriesKant: Critique of Pure ReasonKant: Metaphysics, MiscKant: OntologyKant: Transcendent…Read more
    Kant: CategoriesKant: Critique of Pure ReasonKant: Metaphysics, MiscKant: OntologyKant: Transcendental Arguments
  •  79
    Truth in Metaphysics
    American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (4): 467-490. 2009.
    This essay juxtaposes Duns Scotus’s treatment of the nature of truth with the doctrine concerning truth developed by Heidegger in Being and Time. Both Scotus and Heidegger are concerned inter alia with the same phenomenon: truth as our apprehension of entities. But Scotus speaks of the truth that is in entities, whereas for Heidegger there is no truth in things, but only in their unveilednessto Dasein. Scotus offers us a model in which there are different senses in which we can speak of truth, a…Read more
    This essay juxtaposes Duns Scotus’s treatment of the nature of truth with the doctrine concerning truth developed by Heidegger in Being and Time. Both Scotus and Heidegger are concerned inter alia with the same phenomenon: truth as our apprehension of entities. But Scotus speaks of the truth that is in entities, whereas for Heidegger there is no truth in things, but only in their unveilednessto Dasein. Scotus offers us a model in which there are different senses in which we can speak of truth, and in which these complement one another. Scotus could accommodate Heidegger’s crucial insights about the encounter between Dasein and the world. But Heidegger could not accept much of Scotus’s account without giving up some fundamental points of his argument.
    Philosophy of ReligionJohn Duns ScotusMartin HeideggerMedieval MetaphysicsTheories of Truth, MiscTru…Read more
    Philosophy of ReligionJohn Duns ScotusMartin HeideggerMedieval MetaphysicsTheories of Truth, MiscTruth, Misc
  •  18
    Does God Know Best?
    Philosophia Christi 9 (2): 383-405. 2007.
    Philosophy of Religion
  •  44
    Book reviews (review)
    with Diane Steinberg and Larry Lacy
    International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 40 (2): 117-124. 1996.
    Philosophy of Religion
  •  20
    The Storms of Providence: Navigating the Waters of Calvinism, Arminianism, and Open Theism
    Upa. 2003.
    The Storms of Providence surveys and critiques Calvinism, Arminianism, and Open Theism as models of the divine-world relationship. Further, the book defends a modified version of traditional Arminianism. The author contends that the most theologically and philosophically sound model of the divine-world relationship is one that affirms that human actions are free and not divinely determined, even while asserting that God has complete knowledge of the future
    Divine ProvidenceTheories of Omniscience
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback