Murat Kelikli

Bartin University
  •  21
    The Fourth Figure in Aristotle
    Entelekya Logico-Metaphysical Review 2 (2): 75-98. 2018.
    This paper investigates whether Aristotle was aware of the fourth figure, and if he was aware of the fourth figure, why he excluded it from his system. Various commentators have explained why this figure does not exist in the system, so this paper compiles ane examines these arguments through a certain logical frame. By inquiring into why the fourth figure was not included in his logical system, the paper considers whether logical factors may explain this exclusion.
  •  19
    Protasis and Apophansis in Aristotle’s Logic
    Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy 8 (1): 1-17. 2018.
  •  634
    Aristoteles’in Matematik Felsefesi ve Matematik Soyut­lama
    Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy 7 (2): 33-49. 2017.
    Although there are many questions to be asked about philosophy of mathematics, the fundamental questions to be asked will be questions about what the mathematical object is in view of being and what the mathematical reasoning is in view of knowledge. It is clear that other problems will develop in parallel within the framework of the answers to these questions. For this rea­ son, when we approach Aristotle's philosophy of mathematics over these two basic problems, we come up with the concept of …Read more
  •  248
    Aristoteles’te abese irca yöntemiyle ispatlama
    Kutadgubilig Felsefe-Bilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 23 91-105. 2013.
    Redictio ad absurdum is an important part of Aristotle’s syllogistic. It is connected with direct proof and they are complementary methods. All moods of Aristotle are provable by direct methods and redictio ad absurdum. In this paper, I have studied on the bases and principles of redictio ad absurdum, I showed how to prove by redictio ad absurdum, and how to prove Aristotle by redictio ad absurdum. By redictio ad absurdum, all forms of Aristotle’s method proved in the first figure can be reduced…Read more
  •  1245
    Ahmed Cevdet paşa’nin matik ve ilim anlayişi
    Kutadgubilig Felsefe-Bilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 22 173-185. 2012.
    There are a lot of studies on Ahmed Cevdet Paşa who has been considered as statesman, politician, jurist, historian, sociologist and educationalist. At the same time Ahmet Cevdet Paşa’s studies on logic are critically important when we deal with the last period of the Ottoman Empire. His book which is called Miyar-ı Sedad had both influenced the development of instruction of logic education in madrasahs and created a turning point in the studies on modern logic. For this reason we have discuss…Read more
  •  259
    Aristoteles’ in izahat Yöntemi Hakkindaki Yorumlar
    Kutadgubilig Felsefe-Bilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 25 115-127. 2014.
    There is very little information about the proving by Aristotle’s ecthesis method both in Aristotle’s and his commentators’ articles. Researches on ecthesis which were made by recent commentators are only on expository term. In our study, comments have been evaluated, points that are subject to contradiction have been determined, and opinions about ecthesis have been cited by giving proofs obtained by the ecthesis method.