My philosophical views

Question Answer Comments
A priori knowledge: yes and no Accept: no
Abstract objects: Platonism and nominalism Accept: nominalism
Aesthetic value: objective and subjective Reject both
Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes and no Accept: no
Epistemic justification: internalism and externalism Reject both Another false dichotomy.
External world: idealism, skepticism or non-skeptical realism Other The way this question is framed misses entirely most of the developments in 20th century linguistic turns.
Free will: compatibilism, libertarianism or no free will Lean toward: compatibilism
God: theism and atheism Accept: atheism
Knowledge: empiricism and rationalism Lean toward: empiricism
Knowledge claims: contextualism, relativism or invariantism Accept: contextualism
Laws of nature: Humean and non-Humean Lean toward: Humean
Logic: classical and non-classical Reject both
Mental content: internalism and externalism Accept another alternative Freudian.
Meta-ethics: moral realism and moral anti-realism Reject both I disagree with these terms entirely.
Metaphilosophy: naturalism and non-naturalism Lean toward: naturalism
Mind: physicalism and non-physicalism Accept another alternative
Moral judgment: cognitivism and non-cognitivism Lean toward: non-cognitivism
Moral motivation: internalism and externalism Reject both A false dichotomy.
Newcomb's problem: one box and two boxes Insufficiently familiar with the issue
Normative ethics: deontology, consequentialism or virtue ethics Reject all False choices.
Perceptual experience: disjunctivism, qualia theory, representationalism or sense-datum theory Reject all
Personal identity: biological view, psychological view or further-fact view Agnostic/undecided
Politics: communitarianism, egalitarianism or libertarianism Other I tend toward an Arendtian, Deweyan, critical theory, and sort of civic republican view with some psychoanalytic insights too.
Proper names: Fregean and Millian Accept another alternative Freudian.
Science: scientific realism and scientific anti-realism Other
Teletransporter (new matter): survival and death Other This is utterly ridiculous.
Time: A-theory and B-theory Insufficiently familiar with the issue
Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching, what ought one do?): switch and don't switch Reject both
Truth: correspondence, deflationary or epistemic Reject all Pragmatist.
Zombies: inconceivable, conceivable but not metaphysically possible or metaphysically possible Other Is this a serious question???