My philosophical views

Question Answer Comments
A priori knowledge: yes and no Accept: no
Abstract objects: Platonism and nominalism Accept another alternative
Aesthetic value: objective and subjective Accept: objective
Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes and no Accept: no
Epistemic justification: internalism and externalism Accept: externalism
External world: idealism, skepticism or non-skeptical realism Accept: non-skeptical realism
Free will: compatibilism, libertarianism or no free will Accept: compatibilism
God: theism and atheism Accept: atheism
Knowledge: empiricism and rationalism The question is too unclear to answer
Knowledge claims: contextualism, relativism or invariantism Lean toward: relativism
Laws of nature: Humean and non-Humean Accept: non-Humean
Logic: classical and non-classical Accept: classical
Mental content: internalism and externalism Accept: externalism
Meta-ethics: moral realism and moral anti-realism Accept: moral realism
Metaphilosophy: naturalism and non-naturalism Accept: naturalism
Mind: physicalism and non-physicalism Lean toward: physicalism Of course it depends on what you mean by physicalism...
Moral judgment: cognitivism and non-cognitivism Accept: cognitivism
Moral motivation: internalism and externalism Accept: externalism
Newcomb's problem: one box and two boxes Accept: two boxes
Normative ethics: deontology, consequentialism or virtue ethics Accept an intermediate view
Perceptual experience: disjunctivism, qualia theory, representationalism or sense-datum theory Lean toward: disjunctivism
Personal identity: biological view, psychological view or further-fact view Accept: biological view
Politics: communitarianism, egalitarianism or libertarianism Accept: egalitarianism To be more specific, a kind of liberal egalitarianism.
Proper names: Fregean and Millian Accept: Millian
Science: scientific realism and scientific anti-realism Accept: scientific realism
Teletransporter (new matter): survival and death Accept: death
Time: A-theory and B-theory Accept: B-theory
Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching, what ought one do?): switch and don't switch Accept: switch I always thought that the Trolley problem included the comparison with the fat man on the bridge. Isn't the problem how we explain both sets of intuitions?
Truth: correspondence, deflationary or epistemic Accept: deflationary
Zombies: inconceivable, conceivable but not metaphysically possible or metaphysically possible Lean toward: conceivable but not metaphysically possible