A mixed methods study, this doctoral research explores the relationship between the
classroom language assessment literacy (CLAL) and assessment practices of English
teachers. It is based on the premise that if English teachers are properly oriented in
assessment of language ability in classroom, the quality of classroom assessments will
improve and in turn, teachers will be in a position to carry out “assessment for learning” effectively. The study is designed considering the assessment pol…
Read moreA mixed methods study, this doctoral research explores the relationship between the
classroom language assessment literacy (CLAL) and assessment practices of English
teachers. It is based on the premise that if English teachers are properly oriented in
assessment of language ability in classroom, the quality of classroom assessments will
improve and in turn, teachers will be in a position to carry out “assessment for learning” effectively. The study is designed considering the assessment policies and practices in India as a whole. The intervention takes place in three schools— a CBSE, a State-Board and an ICSE school— and six secondary school English teachers— two each from the above-mentioned schools— in Andhra Pradesh constituted the main participants. This research is significant in the sense that though the new assessment policy in schools demands that teachers carry out classroom assessments, and attaches a lot of importance to those, very little has been done to equip teachers with adequate skills and knowledge to enable them to meet the challenges of classroom assessment. This study tries to draw attention towards this problem and suggests a possible solution.
For its theoretical framework, the study draws on classroom assessment, assessment literacy, second language teacher education, teacher development, teacher beliefs and teacher knowledge. The framework is built after studying and tracing the existing gaps in the research literature in areas relevant to the study.
The study is conducted in three major phases: pre-intervention, intervention and postintervention. In the first phase, the researcher collects information about the CLAL of secondary school English teachers practicing in CBSE, state-board and ICSE schools
through a state-wise survey. Then two teachers each from a CBSE, a state-board and an ICSE school are selected and information about their CLAL, beliefs about assessment and assessment practices is obtained. A teacher development (TD) programme based on the above-mentioned information is designed with a view to developing teachers’ CLAL. In the second phase, the programme is imparted separately to the three pairs of teachers for 18 hours. Records of teachers’ experience and the researcher’s observations are maintained during the intervention. In the last phase, once again, information is collected about the CLAL and assessment practices of the teachers in a similar manner as done in the first stage. Data are analysed both qualitatively and quantitatively, triangulated and meta-inferences are made after a few cross-case analyses. Finally, an effort is made to generalize and discuss the findings, state the implications of the study for policy makers, teacher education, curriculum designers, experts in language assessment and teacher educators, point out the limitations of the project and suggest directions for further research in the area of the study.
The findings of the study suggest that there is a relationship between CLAL and
assessment practices of teachers. But a lot of factors like the assessment policy at
curricular level, institutional policy about assessment, motivation of teachers to utilize
assessment for pedagogic purposes and their English language ability are found to have impact on teachers’ assessment practices. It is also found that a need-based TD
programme can, to a great extent, generate the desired impact on teachers’ assessment practices.