Princeton University
Department of Philosophy
APA Eastern Division
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
  • Weakness of Will and Varities of Practical Irrationality (edited book)
    with Christine Tappolet
    Oxford University Press. 2003.
  •  13
    Weakness of Will and Practical
    In Christine Tappolet & Sarah Stroud (eds.), Weakness of Will and Practical Irrationality, Oxford: Clarendon Press. pp. 121. 2003.
  •  67
    Moral Relativism and Quasi-Absolutism
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (1): 189. 1998.
  •  9
    Rationalité, humanité, normativité
    Philosophiques 31 (2): 405-408. 2004.
  •  9
    Ruwen Ogien, dir., Le réalisme moral (review)
    Philosophiques 28 (1): 219-223. 2001.
  •  11
    Between Universalism and Skepticism: Ethics as Social Artifact (review)
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (3): 732-734. 1997.
  •  40
    Self-control in action and belief
    Philosophical Explorations 24 (2): 225-242. 2021.
    Self-control is normally, if only tacitly, viewed as an inherently practical capacity or achievement: as exercised only in the domain of action. Questioning this assumption, we wish to motivate the...
  •  10
    This chapter highlights and assesses an important form of argument that has often been deployed in debates over moral demandingness. 'They can’t take that away from me' arguments claim to identify something which morality cannot ask us to give up — something which morality allegedly cannot take away from us. Does any argument of this kind succeed? This chapter investigates that question by sketching and critiquing three such arguments from the contemporary literature, including a well-known argu…Read more
  •  45
    Introduction to the Special Issue: The Nature and Implications of Disagreement
    American Philosophical Quarterly 56 (1): 15-28. 2019.
    Disagreement and the implications thereof have emerged as a central preoccupation of recent analytic philosophy. In epistemology, articles on so-called peer disagreement and its implications have burgeoned and now constitute an especially rich subject of discussion in the field. In moral and political philosophy, moral disagreement has of course traditionally been a crucial argumentative lever in meta-ethical debates, and disagreement over conceptions of the good has been the spark for central c…Read more
  •  94
    Conceptual Disagreement
    American Philosophical Quarterly 56 (1): 15-28. 2019.
    Can you disagree with someone without thinking that what they say is false? As we shall see, this is not only possible but quite frequent. Starting with the type of disagreement most familiar from the philosophical literature, we will progressively expand the circle of genuine disagreement until it encompasses even conceptual disagreement, which might sound like a contradiction in terms. For conceptual disagreement necessarily involves the parties' using different concepts, which one might think…Read more
  •  30
    Truth and Truthfulness: an Essay in Genealogy (review)
    Disputatio 1 (18): 197-203. 2005.
  • La partialité par les projets
    Les Ateliers de L’Ethique 3 (1): 41-51. 2008.
    This paper investigates how we can most effectively argue that partiality toward certain people and not others is morally permissible. Philosophers who strongly insist that morality must leave room for partiality have not made explicit their basis for this conclusion; the present paper comparatively assesses a variety of possible argument strategies which could be deployed in this regard. One promising strategy exploits the acknowledged force of the argument from “the personal point of view,” he…Read more
  •  241
    Weakness of Will and Practical Irrationality (edited book)
    Oxford University Press. 2003.
    Among the many practical failures that threaten us, weakness of will or akrasia is often considered to be a paradigm of irrationality. The eleven new essays in this collection, written by an excellent international team of philosophers, some well-established, some younger scholars, give a rich overview of the current debate over weakness of will and practical irrationality more generally. Issues covered include classical questions such as the distinction between weakness and compulsion, the conn…Read more
  •  26
    Good For" supra "Good
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 87 (2): 459-466. 2013.
  •  1
    The International Encyclopedia of Ethics (edited book)
    Wiley-Blackwell. 2013.
  •  28
    Weakness of Will and Practical Judgement
    In Sarah Stroud & Christine Tappolet (eds.), Weakness of Will and Practical Irrationality, Clarendon Press. 2003/2007.
    A practical judgement is one which enjoys an internal, necessary relation to subsequent action or intention, and which can serve as a sufficient explanation of such action or intention. Does the phenomenon of weakness of will show that deliberation does not characteristically issue in such practical judgements? The author argues that the possibility of akrasia does not threaten the view that we make practical judgements, when the latter thesis is properly understood. Indeed, the author suggests …Read more
  •  9
    This chapter considers whether our moral entitlement to manifest certain kinds of partiality stems from a morally basic permission to be partial, or whether it can be accounted for in some other way. In particular, it explores the possibility of justifying partial conduct via a general moral prerogative to pursue our own projects. On this approach, in contexts of plural agency, where two or more people together pursue a joint project, we would have permission to favour our co-agents — but only i…Read more
  •  68
    “Good For” supra “Good”
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 87 (2): 459-466. 2013.
  •  20
    Between Universalism and Skepticism: Ethics as Social Artifact (review)
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (3): 732-734. 1997.
  • Timmons, M. Morality Without Foundations (review)
    Philosophical Books 41 (3): 206-208. 2000.
  •  12
    Moral Commitment and Moral Theory
    Journal of Philosophical Research 26 381-398. 2001.
    This paper examines the nature of what I call moral commitment: that is, a standing commitment to live up to moral demands. I first consider what kind of psychological state moral commitment might be, arguing that moral commitment is a species of commitment to a counterfactual condition. I explore the general structural features of attitudes of this type in order to shed light on how moral commitment might function in an agent’s motivational economy. I then use this understanding of moral commit…Read more
  •  536
    Epistemic partiality in friendship
    Ethics 116 (3): 498-524. 2006.
  •  27
    Review of James Dreier (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Moral Theory (review)
    Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (10). 2006.
  •  7
    Is procrastination weakness of will?
    In Chrisoula Andreou & Mark D. White (eds.), The Thief of Time: Philosophical Essays on Procrastination, Oxford University Press. pp. 51-67. 2010.
  •  65
    Dworkin and Casey on Abortion
    Philosophy and Public Affairs 25 (2): 140-170. 1996.
  •  30
    The Rational and the Moral Order: The Social Roots of Reason and Morality (review)
    Philosophical Review 106 (4): 577. 1997.
    The first four chapters develop his account of reason and reasons in general. Baier calls actions, beliefs, and feelings that can be assessed as rational or irrational “performances”. He argues that the aim of the enterprise of reason is to arrive at performances that are as good as possible ; in order to further this aim, societies promulgate guidelines of rationality. Baier thinks that a being cannot be fully rational unless it has the benefit of such publicly available guidelines. Indeed, “a …Read more
  •  184
    Moral overridingness and moral theory
    Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79 (2). 1998.
  •  72