
7Translations Between Gentzen–Prawitz and Jaśkowski–Fitch Natural Deduction ProofsStudia Logica 107 (6): 11031134. 2019.Two common forms of natural deduction proof systems are found in the Gentzen–Prawitz and Jaśkowski–Fitch systems. In this paper, I provide translations between proofs in these systems, pointing out the ways in which the translations highlight the structural rules implicit in the systems. These translations work for classical, intuitionistic, and minimal logic. I then provide translations for classical S4 proofs.

10Tracking reasons with extensions of relevant logicsLogic Journal of the IGPL 27 (4): 543569. 2019.In relevant logics, necessary truths need not imply each other. In justification logic, necessary truths need not all be justified by the same reason. There is an affinity to these two approaches that suggests their pairing will provide good logics for tracking reasons in a finegrained way. In this paper, I will show how to extend relevant logics with some of the basic operators of justification logic in order to track justifications or reasons. I will define and study three kinds of frames for…Read more

18Translations Between Gentzen–Prawitz and Jaśkowski–Fitch Natural Deduction ProofsStudia Logica 107 (6): 11031134. 2019.Two common forms of natural deduction proof systems are found in the Gentzen–Prawitz and Jaśkowski–Fitch systems. In this paper, I provide translations between proofs in these systems, pointing out the ways in which the translations highlight the structural rules implicit in the systems. These translations work for classical, intuitionistic, and minimal logic. I then provide translations for classical S4 proofs.

26Proof Theory for Functional Modal LogicStudia Logica 106 (1): 4984. 2018.We present some prooftheoretic results for the normal modal logic whose characteristic axiom is \. We present a sequent system for this logic and a hypersequent system for its firstorder form and show that these are equivalent to Hilbertstyle axiomatizations. We show that the question of validity for these logics reduces to that of classical tautologyhood and firstorder logical truth, respectively. We close by proving equivalences with a Fitchstyle proof system for revision theory.

188The Relevant Logic E and Some Close Neighbours: A ReinterpretationIfCoLog Journal of Logics and Their Applications 4 (3): 695730. 2017.This paper has two aims. First, it sets out an interpretation of the relevant logic E of relevant entailment based on the theory of situated inference. Second, it uses this interpretation, together with Anderson and Belnap’s natural deduc tion system for E, to generalise E to a range of other systems of strict relevant implication. Routley–Meyer ternary relation semantics for these systems are produced and completeness theorems are proven.

294Conditionals in Theories of TruthJournal of Philosophical Logic 46 (1): 2763. 2017.We argue that distinct conditionals—conditionals that are governed by different logics—are needed to formalize the rules of Truth Introduction and Truth Elimination. We show that revision theory, when enriched with the new conditionals, yields an attractive theory of truth. We go on to compare this theory with one recently proposed by Hartry Field.

214The Tarskian Turn: Deflationism and Axiomatic TruthPhilosophical Review 122 (1): 144147. 2013.

308Contraction and revisionAustralasian Journal of Logic 13 (3): 5877. 2016.An important question for proponents of noncontractive approaches to paradox is why contraction fails. Zardini offers an answer, namely that paradoxical sentences exhibit a kind of instability. I elaborate this idea using revision theory, and I argue that while instability does motivate failures of contraction, it equally motivates failure of many principles that noncontractive theorists want to maintain.

49Intersubstitutivity principles and the generalization function of truthSynthese 195 (3): 10651075. 2018.We offer a defense of one aspect of Paul Horwich’s response to the Liar paradox—more specifically, of his move to preserve classical logic. Horwich’s response requires that the full intersubstitutivity of ‘ ‘A’ is true’ and A be abandoned. It is thus open to the objection, due to Hartry Field, that it undermines the generalization function of truth. We defend Horwich’s move by isolating the grade of intersubstitutivity required by the generalization function and by providing a new reading of the…Read more

329On Artifacts and TruthPreservationAustralasian Journal of Logic 12 (3): 135158. 2015.In Saving Truth from Paradox, Hartry Field presents and defends a theory of truth with a new conditional. In this paper, I present two criticisms of this theory, one concerning its assessments of validity and one concerning its treatment of truthpreservation claims. One way of adjusting the theory adequately responds to the truthpreservation criticism, at the cost of making the validity criticism worse. I show that in a restricted setting, Field has a way to respond to the validity criticism. …Read more

12NonClassical Circular DefinitionsAustralasian Journal of Logic 14 (1). 2017.Circular denitions have primarily been studied in revision theory in the classical scheme. I present systems of circular denitions in the Strong Kleene and supervaluation schemes and provide complete proof systems for them. One class of denitions, the intrinsic denitions, naturally arises in both schemes. I survey some of the features of this class of denitions.

50Review of Stewart Shapiro's Varieties of Logic (review)Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2015. 2015.
Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Areas of Specialization
16 more
Areas of Interest
16 more
PhilPapers Editorships
Revision Theory of Truth 
Proof Theory 