My philosophical views

Question Answer Comments
A priori knowledge: yes and no Accept: no
Abstract objects: Platonism and nominalism Accept another alternative Why are you omitting conceptualism? Do you think that's just like choices 2 and 4? Bad question as formulated.
Aesthetic value: objective and subjective Accept: objective
Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes and no Accept: yes
Epistemic justification: internalism and externalism Accept: internalism
External world: idealism, skepticism or non-skeptical realism Accept: non-skeptical realism
Free will: compatibilism, libertarianism or no free will Lean toward: compatibilism
God: theism and atheism Accept: atheism
Knowledge: empiricism and rationalism Accept: rationalism
Knowledge claims: contextualism, relativism or invariantism Accept: contextualism
Laws of nature: Humean and non-Humean Accept: non-Humean
Logic: classical and non-classical Accept: classical
Mental content: internalism and externalism The question is too unclear to answer
Meta-ethics: moral realism and moral anti-realism Accept: moral realism
Metaphilosophy: naturalism and non-naturalism Accept both As the issues change the metaphilosophical view changes - this is not metaphysics - its a grab bag [I'm one of the founding editors of the journal, and I know.
Mind: physicalism and non-physicalism Accept: physicalism
Moral judgment: cognitivism and non-cognitivism Accept: cognitivism
Moral motivation: internalism and externalism Accept: internalism
Newcomb's problem: one box and two boxes There is no fact of the matter
Normative ethics: deontology, consequentialism or virtue ethics Accept: deontology
Perceptual experience: disjunctivism, qualia theory, representationalism or sense-datum theory Agnostic/undecided
Personal identity: biological view, psychological view or further-fact view Accept more than one
Politics: communitarianism, egalitarianism or libertarianism Accept more than one Libertarianism is a kind of egalitarianism; there are different issues involved.
Proper names: Fregean and Millian Accept: Fregean I don't think this is well-formulated. NonFregeans are not all Millians.
Science: scientific realism and scientific anti-realism Accept: scientific realism
Teletransporter (new matter): survival and death Accept: death
Time: A-theory and B-theory The question is too unclear to answer This is such a poorly framed question one can't really make out what the framers were thinklng. Suppose I asked you about the spaciality of souls without your knowing that they exist.
Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching, what ought one do?): switch and don't switch Agnostic/undecided
Truth: correspondence, deflationary or epistemic Lean toward: correspondence No non-correspondence view is consistent with either our intuitions or how we operate in the world. Were an adequate other view to surface perhaps I might revise my view.
Zombies: inconceivable, conceivable but not metaphysically possible or metaphysically possible Accept: inconceivable