My philosophical views

Question Answer Comments
A priori knowledge: yes and no Reject both
Abstract objects: Platonism and nominalism Other would reject the alternatives provided as being based on a false premise.
Aesthetic value: objective and subjective Reject both The determination of aesthetic value, as well as ethical, whether objective or subjective is based on dubious premises...
Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes and no Reject both
Epistemic justification: internalism and externalism Reject both If these are the only alternatives, I tend to think Descartes is correct.
External world: idealism, skepticism or non-skeptical realism Reject all Again, the choices are based on the premise that reason is a matter of logical argument. I would question this premise in order to argue that these alternatives need not be accepted.
Free will: compatibilism, libertarianism or no free will Reject all
God: theism and atheism Accept: theism again, the question depends on what one means by "God."
Knowledge: empiricism and rationalism Reject both again, the alternative is based on a false, or rather, a dubious set of premises...
Knowledge claims: contextualism, relativism or invariantism Reject all
Laws of nature: Humean and non-Humean Reject both
Logic: classical and non-classical Reject both
Mental content: internalism and externalism Reject both
Meta-ethics: moral realism and moral anti-realism Reject both
Metaphilosophy: naturalism and non-naturalism Accept another alternative
Mind: physicalism and non-physicalism Reject both
Moral judgment: cognitivism and non-cognitivism Reject both
Moral motivation: internalism and externalism Reject both
Newcomb's problem: one box and two boxes Insufficiently familiar with the issue
Normative ethics: deontology, consequentialism or virtue ethics Reject all again, the choices here are based on a dubious premise.
Perceptual experience: disjunctivism, qualia theory, representationalism or sense-datum theory Reject all
Personal identity: biological view, psychological view or further-fact view Reject all
Politics: communitarianism, egalitarianism or libertarianism Reject all Even this dispute relies on the same premise involving the account of reason as a matter of logical argument.
Proper names: Fregean and Millian Reject both
Science: scientific realism and scientific anti-realism Reject both
Teletransporter (new matter): survival and death The question is too unclear to answer
Time: A-theory and B-theory Insufficiently familiar with the issue
Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching, what ought one do?): switch and don't switch The question is too unclear to answer
Truth: correspondence, deflationary or epistemic Reject all
Zombies: inconceivable, conceivable but not metaphysically possible or metaphysically possible The question is too unclear to answer Depends on what one means by zombie. Hume's account of people as some combo of the reasons and passions just is a good account of people as zombies...will-less creatures driven by their hungers and the commands of their masters.