Cardiff university Queens Buildings, Wales, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
  •  5
    Topologizing Interpretable Groups in p-Adically Closed Fields
    Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 64 (4): 571-609. 2023.
    We consider interpretable topological spaces and topological groups in a p-adically closed field K. We identify a special class of “admissible topologies” with topological tameness properties like generic continuity, similar to the topology on definable subsets of Kn. We show that every interpretable set has at least one admissible topology, and that every interpretable group has a unique admissible group topology. We then consider definable compactness (in the sense of Fornasiero) on interpreta…Read more
  •  6
    Abelian groups definable in P-adically closed fields
    Journal of Symbolic Logic 1-22. forthcoming.
    Recall that a group G has finitely satisfiable generics (fsg) or definable f-generics (dfg) if there is a global type p on G and a small model $M_0$ such that every left translate of p is finitely satisfiable in $M_0$ or definable over $M_0$, respectively. We show that any abelian group definable in a p-adically closed field is an extension of a definably compact fsg definable group by a dfg definable group. We discuss an approach which might prove a similar statement for interpretable abelian g…Read more
  •  4
    A note on fsg$\text{fsg}$ groups in p‐adically closed fields
    Mathematical Logic Quarterly 69 (1): 50-57. 2023.
    Let G be a definable group in a p-adically closed field M. We show that G has finitely satisfiable generics ( fsg $\text{fsg}$ ) if and only if G is definably compact. The case M = Q p $M = \mathbb {Q}_p$ was previously proved by Onshuus and Pillay.
  •  10
    On non-compact p-adic definable groups
    Journal of Symbolic Logic 87 (1): 188-213. 2022.
    In [16], Peterzil and Steinhorn proved that if a group G definable in an o-minimal structure is not definably compact, then G contains a definable torsion-free subgroup of dimension 1. We prove here a p-adic analogue of the Peterzil–Steinhorn theorem, in the special case of abelian groups. Let G be an abelian group definable in a p-adically closed field M. If G is not definably compact then there is a definable subgroup H of dimension 1 which is not definably compact. In a future paper we will g…Read more
  •  5
    A criterion for uniform finiteness in the imaginary sorts
    Archive for Mathematical Logic 61 (3): 583-589. 2022.
    Let T be a theory. If T eliminates \, it need not follow that \ eliminates \, as shown by the example of the p-adics. We give a criterion to determine whether \ eliminates \. Specifically, we show that \ eliminates \ if and only if \ is eliminated on all interpretable sets of “unary imaginaries.” This criterion can be applied in cases where a full description of \ is unknown. As an application, we show that \ eliminates \ when T is a C-minimal expansion of ACVF.
  •  7
    Forking and dividing in fields with several orderings and valuations
    Journal of Mathematical Logic 22 (1). 2021.
    We consider existentially closed fields with several orderings, valuations, and p-valuations. We show that these structures are NTP2 of finite burden, but usually have the independence property. Mo...
  •  13
    Dp-finite fields I(B): Positive characteristic
    Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 172 (6): 102949. 2021.
  •  9
    Forking and dividing in fields with several orderings and valuations
    Journal of Mathematical Logic 22 (1): 2150025. 2022.
    We consider existentially closed fields with several orderings, valuations, and [Formula: see text]-valuations. We show that these structures are NTP2 of finite burden, but usually have the independence property. Moreover, forking agrees with dividing, and forking can be characterized in terms of forking in ACVF, RCF, and [Formula: see text]CF.
  •  18
    Dp-finite fields I(A): The infinitesimals
    Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 172 (6): 102947. 2021.
    We prove that NIP valued fields of positive characteristic are henselian, and we begin to generalize the known results on dp-minimal fields to dp-finite fields. On any unstable dp-finite field K, we define a type-definable group of “infinitesimals,” corresponding to a canonical group topology on (K, +). We reduce the classification of positive characteristic dp-finite fields to the construction of non-trivial Aut(K/A)-invariant valuation rings.
  •  12
    On the Proof of Elimination of Imaginaries in Algebraically Closed Valued Fields
    Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 61 (3): 363-381. 2020.
    We give a simplified proof of elimination of imaginaries in ACVF, based on ideas of Hrushovski. This proof manages to avoid many of the technical issues which arose in the original proof by Haskell, Hrushovski, and Macpherson.
  •  9
    Interpretable sets in dense o-minimal structures
    Journal of Symbolic Logic 83 (4): 1477-1500. 2018.
  •  18
    The canonical topology on dp-minimal fields
    Journal of Mathematical Logic 18 (2): 1850007. 2018.
    We construct a nontrivial definable type V field topology on any dp-minimal field K that is not strongly minimal, and prove that definable subsets of Kn have small boundary. Using this topology and...