Department Members
Department Activity
Details
-
MA program offered
Also at University of Groningen
-
Boudewijn de Bruin, The Liberal Value of PrivacyLaw and Philosophy 29 (5): 505-534. 2010.
-
Boudewijn de Bruin, Explaining Games: The Epistemic Programme in Game TheorySpringer. 2010.
-
Pauline Kleingeld, Moral consciousness and the 'fact of reason'In Andrews Reath & Jens Timmermann (eds.), Kant's Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide, Cambridge University Press. 2010.
-
Emar Maier, Quoted imperativesIn Martin Prinzhorn, Viola Schmitt & Sarah Zobel (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn Und Bedeutung 14, . pp. 1-16. 2010.
-
Daan Evers, The End‐Relational Theory of ‘Ought’ and the Weight of ReasonsDialectica 64 (3): 405-417. 2010.
-
Andrea Sangiacomo, Sulla compiutezza del De Intellectus Emendatione di SpinozaRivista di Storia Della Filosofia 65 (1): 1-23. 2010.
-
Andrea Sangiacomo, The completeness of de intellectus emendatione by SpinozaRivista di Storia Della Filosofia 65 (1): 1-23. 2010.
-
Frank Hindriks, Emoties en intenties in de experimentele ethiekAlgemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 102 (1): 2-13. 2010.
-
Frank Hindriks, Person as Lawyer: How Having a Guilty Mind Explains Attributions of Intentional AgencyBehavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (4): 339-340. 2010.
-
Frank Hindriks, Review of Russell Hardin’s How do you know?: the economics of ordinary knowledge (review)Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 3 (1): 93-97. 2010.
-
Frank Hindriks, The Inner Life of a Rational Agent. In Defence of Philosophical Behaviourism, by R. StoutMind 119 (473): 246-249. 2010.
-
Frank Hindriks, Russell Hardin's How do you know?: the economics of ordinary knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009, 256 pp (review)Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 3 (1): 93. 2010.
-
Bart Garssen and Jan Albert Van Laar, A pragma-dialectical response to objectivist epistemic challengesInformal Logic 30 (2): 122-141. 2010.
-
Jan Albert van Laar, Argumentative Bluff in Eristic Discussion: An Analysis and EvaluationArgumentation 24 (3): 383-398. 2010.
-
David Atkinson and Jeanne Peijnenburg, Justification by Infinite LoopsNotre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (4): 407-416. 2010.
-
David Atkinson and Jeanne Peijnenburg, The Solvability of Probabilistic Regresses. A Reply to Frederik HerzbergStudia Logica 94 (3): 347-353. 2010.
-
Jeanne Peijnenburg, Ineffectual Foundations: Reply to Gwiazda: DiscussionsMind 119 (476): 1125-1133. 2010.
-
Jeanne Peijnenburg and David Atkinson, Lamps, cubes, balls and walls: Zeno problems and solutionsPhilosophical Studies 150 (1): 49-59. 2010.
-
Jeanne Peijnenburg and David Atkinson, Lamps, cubes, balls and walls: Zeno problems and solutionsPhilosophical Studies 150 (1). 2010.
-
Ruth Millikan, Markus Wild, and Martin Lenz, INTERVIEW: Gedacht wird in der Welt, nicht im KopfDeutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 58 (6): 981-1000. 2010.
-
Boudewijn de Bruin, On the Narrow Epistemology of Game Theoretic AgentsIn Ondrej Majer, Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen & Tero Tulenheimo (eds.), Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy, Springer. 2009.
-
Boudewijn de Bruin, Over de wetenschappelijkheid van de rechtswetenschapNetherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 38 (3): 236-243. 2009.
-
Boudewijn de Bruin, Doxastische en epistemische vrijheidTijdschrift Voor Filosofie 71 (3): 529. 2009.
-
Boudewijn de Bruin, Overmathematisation in game theory: pitting the Nash Equilibrium Refinement Programme against the Epistemic ProgrammeStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (3): 290-300. 2009.
-
Boudewijn de Bruin, The Logic of ValuingIn Thomas Boylan & Ruvin Gekker (eds.), Economics, Rational Choice and Normative Philosophy, Routledge. 2009.
-
Boudewijn de Bruin, We and the plural subjectPhilosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (2): 235-259. 2009.
-
Boudewijn de Bruin, Liberal and Republican FreedomJournal of Political Philosophy 17 (4): 418-439. 2009.