Department Affiliates
Department Activity
Details
Also at University of Inland Norway
-
Mattias Skipper, Higher-Order Evidence and the Normativity of LogicIn Scott Stapleford & Kevin McCain (eds.), Epistemic Duties: New Arguments, New Angles, Routledge. 2020.
-
Mattias Skipper and Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen, When Conciliation Frustrates the Epistemic Priorities of GroupsIn Fernandfo Broncano-Berrocal & J. Adam Carter (eds.), The epistemology of group disagreement: an introduction, Routledge. 2020.
-
Andrew Tedder, Grace Paterson, and Ellie Ripley, Qua Solution, 0-Qua Has ProblemsJournal of Analytic Theology 8 (1): 405-411. 2020.
-
-
-
Mikkel Gerken, Truth‐Sensitivity and Folk EpistemologyPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research 100 (1): 3-25. 2020.
-
Mikkel Gerken and Esben Nedenskov Petersen, Epistemic norms of assertion and actionIn Sanford Goldberg (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Assertion, Oxford University Press. 2020.
-
Mikkel Gerken, How We Understand Others: Philosophy and Social Cognition, by Shannon SpauldingMind 129 (513): 268-275. 2020.
-
Mikkel Gerken, Public scientific testimony in the scientific imageStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A (C). 2020.
-
Mikkel Gerken, How to balance Balanced Reporting and Reliable ReportingPhilosophical Studies 177 (10): 3117-3142. 2020.
-
Mikkel Gerken, Chad Gonnerman, Joshua Alexander, and John Philip Waterman, Salient Alternatives in PerspectiveAustralasian Journal of Philosophy 98 (4): 792-810. 2020.
-
Mikkel Gerken, Disagreement and Epistemic Injustice from a Communal PerspectiveIn Fernandfo Broncano-Berrocal & J. Adam Carter (eds.), The epistemology of group disagreement: an introduction, Routledge. 2020.
-
Mikkel Gerken, Epistemic entitlement : its scope and limitsIn Peter Graham & Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (eds.), Epistemic Entitlement, Oxford University Press. pp. 151-178. 2020.
-
Philippe Stamenkovic, Against ‘hybridism’: for a distinction between nature and societyInscriptions 3. 2020.
-
Philippe Stamenkovic, The contradictions and dangers of Bruno Latour’s conception of climate scienceDisputatio 9 (13). 2020.
-
Andreas Brekke Carlsson, Shame and AttributabilityIn David Shoemaker (ed.), Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility Volume 6, Oxford University Press. 2019.
-
-
Anna Drożdżowicz, Do we hear meanings? – between perception and cognitionInquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 66 (2): 196-228. 2019.
-
-
-
Kåre Letrud, The Gordian Knot of Demarcation: Tying Up Some Loose EndsInternational Studies in the Philosophy of Science 32 (1): 3-11. 2019.
-
Kåre Letrud and Sigbjørn Hernes, Affirmative citation bias in scientific myth debunking: A three-in-one case studyPLoS ONE 9 (14). 2019.
-
Nathaniel Sharadin and Finnur Dellsén, Promotion as contrastive increase in expected fitPhilosophical Studies 176 (5): 1263-1290. 2019.
-
James R. Beebe, Maria Baghramian, Luke Drury, and Finnur Dellsén, Divergent Perspectives on Expert Disagreement: Preliminary Evidence from Climate Science, Climate Policy, Astrophysics, and Public OpinionEnvironmental Communication 13 35-50. 2019.
-
Finnur Dellsén, Rational understanding: toward a probabilistic epistemology of acceptabilitySynthese 198 (3): 2475-2494. 2019.
-
Susanne Burri and Lars Christie, On the enforceability of poverty-related responsibilitiesEthics and Global Politics 12 (1): 68-75. 2019.
-
Hedda Hassel Mørch, The Argument for Panpsychism from Experience of CausationIn William Seager (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Panpsychism, Routledge. 2019.
-
Hedda Hassel Mørch, Is Consciousness Intrinsic?: A Problem for the Integrated Information TheoryJournal of Consciousness Studies 26 (1-2). 2019.
-
Hedda Hassel Mørch, Phenomenal knowledge why: the explanatory knowledge argument against physicalismIn Sam Coleman (ed.), The Knowledge Argument, Cambridge University Press. 2019.
-
Hedda Hassel Mørch, Is the Integrated Information Theory of Consciousness Compatible with Russellian Panpsychism?Erkenntnis 84 (5): 1065-1085. 2019.