Department Affiliates
Department Activity
Details
-
MA program offered
Also at University of Lethbridge
-
Katharina Stevens, Humility as a necessary virtue in common-law decision makingJurisprudence 14 (4): 443-461. 2023.
-
David Balcarras, What Is It To Have A Language?Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 104 (4): 837-866. 2023.
-
David Balcarras, Functionalism and tacit knowledge of grammarPhilosophical Perspectives 37 (1): 18-48. 2023.
-
Nicholas Dunn, Reflections of Reason: Kant on Practical JudgementKantian Review 28 (4): 575-596. 2023.
-
Katharina Stevens, Silence at the Meta-Level: A Story about Argumentative CrueltyPhilosophy and Rhetoric 55 (1): 76-82. 2022.
-
Katharina Stevens and Nicole Lockstadt, The Adversary System's Argumentative Structure Threatens, Not Protects DignityIn James Penner & Mark McBride (eds.), New Essays on the Nature of Legal Reasoning, Hart Publishing. 2022.
-
Susan Dieleman, Richard Rorty and the Epistemic Defense of DemocracyContemporary Pragmatism 19 (3): 151-169. 2022.
-
Susan Dieleman, David E. McClean, and Paul Showler, The Ethics of Richard Rorty: Moral Communities, Self-Transformation, and Imagination (edited book)Routledge. 2022.
-
Susan Dieleman, Traveling with a Reconstructed Pragmatist Map: A Commentary on Chris Voparil’s Reconstructing PragmatismContemporary Pragmatism 19 (4): 401-409. 2022.
-
Susan Dieleman, Richard Rorty: Outgrowing Modern NihilismTracyLlaneraCham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020. Pp. vii + 167 (review)Metaphilosophy 53 (1): 144-147. 2022.
-
Susan Dieleman, Richard Rorty: Narrative as Anti-Authoritarian Therapy and as Cultural PoliticsIn Scott F. Aikin & Robert B. Talisse (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Pragmatism, Routledge. pp. 70-74. 2022.
-
Katharina Stevens, Charity for Moral Reasons? - A Defense of the Principle of Charity in ArgumentationArgumentation and Advocacy 1 (online). 2021.
-
Katharina Stevens, Fooling the Victim: Of Straw Men and Those Who Fall for ThemPhilosophy and Rhetoric 54 (2): 109-127. 2021.
-
Katharina Stevens and John Casey, Introduction: Adversariality in ArgumentTopoi 40 (5): 833-836. 2021.
-
Katharina Stevens, Argument is Moral. Using Walton's Dialectical Tools to Evaluate Argumentation from a Moral PerspectiveJournal of Applied Logics 8 (1): 137-158. 2021.
-
Susan Dieleman, Cultural Politics, Critical Reflexivity, and Post-Truth Politics: A Response to Clayton Chin’s The Practice of Political Theory: Rorty and Continental ThoughtContemporary Pragmatism 18 (4): 349-357. 2021.
-
Susan Dieleman, Rorty and Beyond ed. by Randall Auxier, Eli Kramer and Krzysztof Piotr Skowroński (review)American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 42 (3): 83-87. 2021.
-
Susan Dieleman, Thinking with Rorty about How to Make Philosophy More LivableIn Marchetti Giancarlo (ed.), The Ethics, Epistemology, and Politics of Richard Rorty, Routledge. pp. 209-225. 2021.
-
Nicholas Dunn, Subsuming ‘determining’ under ‘reflecting’: Kant’s power of judgment, reconsideredInquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy. 2021.
-
Katharina Stevens, On the Puzzling Death of the Sanctity-of-Life ArgumentArgumentation 34 (1): 55-81. 2020.
-
Katharina Stevens, Setting Precedents Without Making Norms?Law and Philosophy 39 (6): 577-616. 2020.
-
Katharina Stevens and Daniel Cohen, Angelic Devil’s Advocates and the Forms of AdversarialityTopoi 40 (5): 899-912. 2020.
-
Nicholas Dunn, Plurality and the potential for agreement: Arendt, Kant, and the “way of thinking” of the world citizenConstellations 27 (2): 244-257. 2020.
-
Nicholas Dunn, Kant and the Demands of Normativity: Response to HarbinDialogue 59 (4): 613-619. 2020.
-
Nicholas Dunn, What is orientation in judgment?: an essay on Kant’s theory of UrteilskraftDissertation, McGill University. 2020.