University of Manchester, School of Social Sciences - PhilPeople

Department Affiliates

Department Activity

Details

Administrators

Joel Smith

Also at University of Manchester

Department Affiliates

Department Activity

Also at University of Manchester

Topic

Order

Faculty only

Fraser MacBride, The Cambridge Revolt Against Idealism: Was There Ever an Eden?
Metaphilosophy 43 (1-2): 135-146. 2012.

Fraser MacBride, The Cambridge Revolt Against Idealism: Was There Ever an Eden?
In Armen T. Marsoobian, Eric Cavallero & Alexis Papazoglou (eds.), The Pursuit of Philosophy, Wiley-blackwell. 2012.

Fraser MacBride, Extreme Metaphysics: Hossack on Logical Objects, Facts, Propositions and Universals
Dialectica 65 (1): 87-101. 2011.

Fraser MacBride, Impure reference: A way around the concept horse paradox
Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1): 297-312. 2011.

Fraser MacBride, Relations and Truthmaking
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (1pt1): 161-179. 2011.

Fraser MacBride, Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus by Roger White (review)
Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (5). 2009.

Fraser MacBride, Universals : the contemporary debate
In Robin Le Poidevin, Simons Peter, McGonigal Andrew & Ross P. Cameron (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Metaphysics, Routledge. 2009.

Fraser MacBride, Can Ante Rem structuralism solve the access problem?
Philosophical Quarterly 58 (230): 155-164. 2008.

Fraser MacBride, Neutral relations revisited
Dialectica 61 (1). 2007.

Fraser MacBride, Review of G. Rodriguez-Pereyra's Resemblance Nominalism (review)

Fraser Macbride, Identity and Modality
Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 69 (2): 398-399. 2007.

Fraser MacBride, Identity and modality (edited book)
Oxford University Press. 2006.

Fraser MacBride, The Julius caesar objection : More problematic than ever
In Identity and modality, Oxford University Press. pp. 174. 2006.

Fraser MacBride, What constitutes the numerical diversity of mathematical objects?
Analysis 66 (1): 63-69. 2006.

Fraser MacBride, The Julio César problem
Dialectica 59 (2). 2005.

Fraser Macbride, The particular–universal distinction: A dogma of metaphysics?
Mind 114 (455): 565-614. 2005.

Fraser MacBride, Introducing Analytic Philosophy: Its Sense and its Nonsense 1879–2002
Dialectica 59 (1): 81-87. 2005.

Fraser MacBride, Lewis's animadversions on the truthmaker principle
In Helen Beebee & Julian Dodd (eds.), Truthmakers: The Contemporary Debate, Clarendon Press. pp. 117-40. 2005.

Fraser MacBride, Predicate reference
In Ernie Lepore & Barry C. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language, Oxford University Press. pp. 422--475. 2005.

Fraser MacBride, Ramsey on Universals
In Hallvard Lillehammer & D. H. Mellor (eds.), Ramsey's Legacy, Oxford University Press Uk. pp. 83-104. 2005.

Fraser MacBride, Structuralism reconsidered
In Stewart Shapiro (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic, Oxford University Press. pp. 563--589. 2005.

Fraser MacBride, Particulars, modes and universals: An examination of E.j. Lowe's four-fold ontology
Dialectica 58 (3). 2004.

Fraser MacBride, Introduction to Foundations of Logic & Mathematics, Special Issue
Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214). 2004.

Fraser MacBride, Can structuralism solve the ‘access’ problem?
Analysis 64 (4). 2004.

Fraser MacBride, Review of Gonzalo Rodriguez-pereyra, Resemblance Nominalism: A Solution to the Problem of Universals (review)
Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2004 (2). 2004.

Fraser MacBride, Two Theories of Modality A Reply to von Wachter
Metaphysica 6 111-128. 2004.

Fraser MacBride, Whence the particular-universal distinction?
Grazer Philosophische Studien 67 (1): 181-194. 2004.

Fraser MacBride, Speaking with Shadows: A Study of Neo‐Logicism
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (1): 103-163. 2003.

Fraser MacBride, Facts and universals: Besprechungsaufsatz zu: Herbert Hochberg, Russell, Moore and Wittgenstein: The revival of realism. Frankfurt, A. M.: Hänsel-hohenhausen, 2001 (review)
Grazer Philosophische Studien 65 (1): 207-222. 2002.

Fraser MacBride, Truth-Making and Analysis: A Reply to Rodriguez-Pereyra
Philosophical Papers 31 (1): 49-61. 2002.

Prev.
1
2
3
Next

Details

Administrators

Joel Smith