Department Members
Department Activity
Details
-
MA program offered
-
PhD program offered
Also at Michigan State University
-
Lisa H. Schwartzman, Non-Ideal Theorizing, Social Groups, and Knowledge of Oppression: A ResponseHypatia 24 (4). 2009.
-
Heather Douglas, Philosophy of Science, Political Engagement, and the Cold War: An IntroductionScience & Education 18 (2): 157-160. 2009.
-
Heather Douglas, Reintroducing prediction to explanationPhilosophy of Science 76 (4): 444-463. 2009.
-
Paul B. Thompson, Animal biotechnology: How not to presumeAmerican Journal of Bioethics 8 (6). 2008.
-
Paul B. Thompson, Agrarian philosophy and ecological ethicsScience and Engineering Ethics 14 (4): 527-544. 2008.
-
Paul B. Thompson, Borgmann on commodification: A comment on real american ethicsJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (1): 75-84. 2008.
-
Paul Thompson, Book Review: Albert Howard Soil and Health + Julie Guthman, Agrarian Dreams (review)Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (3): 297-301. 2008.
-
Paul B. Thompson, The agricultural ethics of biofuels: A first look (review)Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (2): 183-198. 2008.
-
Paul B. Thompson, The opposite of human enhancement: Nanotechnology and the blind chicken problem (review)NanoEthics 2 (3): 305-316. 2008.
-
Paul B. Thompson, Handbook of Rural Studies (Book review) (review)Agriculture and Human Values 25 (1): 137-138. 2008.
-
Kenneth H. David and Paul B. Thompson, What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos (edited book)Elsevier/Academic Press. 2008.
-
Paul B. Thompson, Nano and bio : how are they alike? How are they different?In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos, Elsevier/academic Press. 2008.
-
Paul Thompson, The Ethics of Intensification: Agricultural Development and Cultural Chang (edited book)Springer. 2008.
-
David Godden and Douglas Walton, Defeasibility in Judicial Opinion: Logical or Procedural?Informal Logic 28 (1): 6-19. 2008.
-
David M. Godden, On common knowledge and ad populum: Acceptance as grounds for acceptabilityPhilosophy and Rhetoric 41 (2). 2008.
-
Todd Hedrick, Race, Difference, and Anthropology in Kant’s CosmopolitanismJournal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2). 2008.
-
Matt Ferkany, The educational importance of self-esteemJournal of Philosophy of Education 42 (1): 119-132. 2008.
-
Matt Ferkany, The Educational Importance of Self-EsteemJournal of Philosophy of Education 42 (1): 119-132. 2008.
-
Robyn Bluhm, Beyond the basicsIn Luc Faucher & Christine Tappolet (eds.), The modularity of emotions, University of Calgary Press. 2008.
-
Michael O'Rourke, Review of Eric T. Olson, What Are We? A Study in Personal Ontology (review)Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (3). 2008.
-
Heather Douglas, The role of values in expert reasoningPublic Affairs Quarterly 22 (1): 1-18. 2008.
-
Paul B. Thompson, Theorizing Technological and Institutional Change: Alienability, Rivalry, and Exclusion CostIn Pieter E. Vermaas, Peter Kroes, Andrew Light & Steven A. Moore (eds.), Philosophy and Design: From Engineering to Architecture, Springer. pp. 131-140. 2007.
-
Paul Thompson, Food Biotechnology in Ethical PerspectiveEnvironmental Values 16 (4): 544-547. 2007.
-
Paul B. Thompson, Norton’s Sustainability: Some Comments on Risk and SustainabilityJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (4): 375-386. 2007.
-
Paul B. Thompson, Agriculture and working-class political culture: A lesson from The Grapes of WrathAgriculture and Human Values 24 (2): 165-177. 2007.
-
Paul Thompson, Theorizing Technological and Institutional ChangeTechné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 11 (1): 19-31. 2007.
-
David Godden and Douglas Walton, Advances in the Theory of Argumentation Schemes and Critical QuestionsInformal Logic 27 (3): 267-292. 2007.
-
David Godden and Douglas N. Walton, A theory of presumption for everyday argumentationPragmatics and Cognition 15 (2): 313-346. 2007.