• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition

Universität Regensburg
Department of Philosophy

Follow
News Feed

Department Affiliates

  • 6
    Regular faculty
  • 2
    Other faculty
  • Retired faculty
  • 6
    Graduate students
  • 18
    Undergraduates
  • 5
    Alumni
  • 1
    Other

Department Activity

  •  News and Updates
  •  Publications
 More details

Details

  • MA program offered
  • PhD program offered
  • Website

Administrators

  • Photo of Tim Kraft
    Tim Kraft

Also at Universität Regensburg

  • All departments
  • Other departments

Department Affiliates

  • 6
    Regular faculty
  • 2
    Other faculty
  • Retired faculty
  • 6
    Graduate students
  • 18
    Undergraduates
  • 5
    Alumni
  • 1
    Other

Department Activity

  •  News and Updates
  •  Publications

Also at Universität Regensburg

  • All departments
  • Other departments

  • Sven Ove Hansson and Hans Rott, How not to change the theory of theory change: A reply to Tennant
    British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (3): 361-380. 1995.
    Photo of Sven Ove Hansson Photo of Hans Rott
  • Hans Rott, Zur Wissenschaftsphilosophie von Imre Lakatos
    Philosophia Naturalis 31 25-62. 1994.
    Photo of Hans Rott
  • Hans Rott, Coherent Choice and Epistemic Entrenchment
    Photo of Hans Rott
  • Hans Rott, Belief Contraction in the Context of the General Theory of Rational Choice
    Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (4): 1426-1450. 1993.
    Photo of Hans Rott
  • Hans Rott, Modellings for belief change: Prioritization and entrenchment
    Theoria 58 (1): 21-57. 1992.
    Photo of Hans Rott
  • Hans Rott, Preferential belief change using generalized epistemic entrenchment
    Journal of Logic, Language and Information 1 (1): 45-78. 1992.
    Photo of Hans Rott
  • Hans Rott, On the Logic of Theory Change: More Maps Between Different Kinds of Contraction Function
    Photo of Hans Rott
  • Hans Rott, Modellings for Belief Change: Base Contraction, Multiple Contraction, and Epistemic Entrenchment
    Photo of Hans Rott
  • Hans Rott, A nonmonotonic conditional logic for belief revision
    In Andre Fuhrmann & Michael Morreau (eds.), The Logic of Theory Change: Workshop, Konstanz, FRG, October 13-15, 1989, Proceedings, Springer. 1991.
    Photo of Hans Rott
  • Hans Rott, Reduktion und Revision: Aspekte des nichtmonotonen Theorienwandels
    Peter Lang. 1991.
    Photo of Hans Rott
  • Hans Rott, Two methods of constructing contractions and revisions of knowledge systems
    Journal of Philosophical Logic 20 (2). 1991.
    Photo of Hans Rott
  • Michael Morreau and Hans Rott, Is it impossible to keep up to date?
    Photo of Hans Rott Photo of Michael Morreau
  • Hans Rott, Approximation versus Idealization: The Kepler-Newton-Case
    Photo of Hans Rott
  • Hans Rott, Conditionals and theory change: Revisions, expansions, and additions
    Synthese 81 (1): 91-113. 1989.
    Photo of Hans Rott
  • Hans Rott, Reduction: Some criteria and criticisms of the structuralist concept
    Erkenntnis 27 (2). 1987.
    Photo of Hans Rott
  • Hans Rott, Ifs, though, and because
    Erkenntnis 25 (3): 345-370. 1986.
    Photo of Hans Rott
  • Hans Rott, Chaos: The Reason for Structural Causation
    Photo of Hans Rott
  • Hans Rott, Conditionals, Support and Connexivity
    Photo of Hans Rott
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Next

Details

  • MA program offered
  • PhD program offered
  • Website

Administrators

  • Photo of Tim Kraft
    Tim Kraft
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback