University of Texas at Austin, Department of Philosophy - PhilPeople

Department Affiliates

Department Activity

Details

Also at University of Texas at Austin

Department Affiliates

Department Activity

Also at University of Texas at Austin

Topic

Order

Faculty only

Jonathan Dancy, What is particularism in ethics?

Jonathan Dancy, On how to be a moral rationalist
Philosophical Books 47 (2): 103-110. 2006.

Jonathan Dancy, What do reasons do?
In Terry Horgan & Mark Timmons (eds.), Metaethics After Moore, Oxford University Press Uk. pp. 39-60. 2006.

Jonathan Dancy, Real Values in a Humean Context
Ratio 9 (2): 171-183. 2006.

Jonathan Dancy, Non-Naturalism
In David Copp (ed.), The Oxford handbook of ethical theory, Oxford University Press. 2006.

Jonathan Dancy, Reasons, relevance and salience; a response to Hookway

Jonathan Dancy, On how to be a moral rationalist, a contribution to a symposium on C. Peacocke The Realm of Reason

Jonathan Dancy, Non-Naturalism
In David Copp (ed.), The Oxford handbook of ethical theory, Oxford University Press. 2006.

Jonathan Dancy, What do reasons do?

Larry Laudan, Truth, Error, and Criminal Law: An Essay in Legal Epistemology
Cambridge University Press. 2006.

Julia Driver, Autonomy and the Asymmetry Problem for Moral Expertise
Philosophical Studies 128 (3): 619-644. 2006.

Roy Sorensen, Spinning Shadows
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (2). 2006.

Roy Sorensen, A séance with an immortal
Philosophy 81 (3): 395-416. 2006.

Roy Sorensen, Sharp Edges from Hedges: Fatalism, Vagueness and Epistemic Possibility
Philosophical Studies 131 (3): 607-626. 2006.

Roy Sorensen, The Disappearing Act
Analysis 66 (4): 319-325. 2006.

Roy Sorensen, Originless Sin: Rational Dilemmas for Satisficers
Philosophical Quarterly 56 (223). 2006.

Roy Sorensen, Meta-conceivability and Thought Experiments
In Shaun Nichols (ed.), The Architecture of the Imagination: New Essays on Pretence, Possibility, and Fiction, Oxford University Press Uk. pp. 257-272. 2006.

Roy Sorensen, Future law: Prepunishment and the causal theory of verdicts
Noûs 40 (1). 2006.

Roy Sorensen, Ockham a insolunilia 1
Ostium 2 (4). 2006.

David Sosa, Rigidity
In Ernie Lepore & Barry C. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language, Oxford University Press. 2005.

David Sosa, 20.1 WHAT is RIGIDITY?
In Ernie Lepore & Barry C. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language, Oxford University Press. pp. 476. 2005.

Michelle Montague, Interpreted Logical Forms
In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd Edition, Elesvier. 2005.

Michelle Montague, Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd Edition
Elesvier. 2005.

Mark Sainsbury, A short history of theories of names
In R. M. Sainsbury (ed.), Reference Without Referents, Oxford University Press Uk. pp. 1-46. 2005.

Mark Sainsbury, Pronouns: anaphora and demonstration
In R. M. Sainsbury (ed.), Reference Without Referents, Oxford University Press Uk. pp. 125-169. 2005.

Mark Sainsbury, Proper names
In R. M. Sainsbury (ed.), Reference Without Referents, Oxford University Press Uk. pp. 86-124. 2005.

R. Mark Sainsbury, Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, Volume 1: The Dawn of Analysis (review)
Philosophical Studies 129 (3): 645-665. 2005.

Ian Proops, Kant’s Conception of Analytic Judgment
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (3). 2005.

Ray Buchanan and Gary Ostertag, Has the problem of incompleteness rested on a mistake?
Mind 114 (456): 889-913. 2005.

Galen Strawson, Intentionality and experience: Terminological preliminaries
In David Woodruff Smith & Amie Lynn Thomasson (eds.), Phenomenology and Philosophy of Mind, Oxford: Clarendon Press. pp. 41--66. 2005.

Prev.
1
2
…
23
24
25
26
27
…
39
40
Next

Details