•  111
    Philosophy of language explores some of the fundamental yet most technical problems in philosophy, such as meaning and reference, semantics, and propositional attitudes. Some of its greatest exponents, including Gottlob Frege, Ludwig Wittgenstein and Bertrand Russell are amongst the major figures in the history of philosophy. In this clear and carefully structured introduction to the subject Gary Kemp explains the following key topics: the basic nature of philosophy of language and its historica…Read more
  •  26
    Croce's aesthetics
    Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. forthcoming.
  •  9
    'The Domain of Images' by James Elkins
    British Journal of Aesthetics 40 (3): 400-402. 2000.
  •  73
    Museums and their practices—especially those involving collection, curation and exhibition—generate a host of philosophical questions. Such questions are not limited to the domains of ethics and aesthetics, but go further into the domains of metaphysics, epistemology and philosophy of religion. Despite the prominence of museums as public institutions, they have until recently received surprisingly little scrutiny from philosophers in the Anglo-American tradition. By bringing together contributio…Read more
  •  98
    Gary Kemp presents a penetrating investigation of key issues in the philosophy of language, by means of a comparative study of two great figures of late twentieth-century philosophy. He reveals unexplored tensions between the views of Quine and Davidson, and presents a powerful argument in favour of Quine and methodological naturalism.
  •  70
    Philosophies of art and beauty
    British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (1): 95-97. 2002.
  •  12
    Did Wittgenstein have a Theory of Colour?
    In Frederik Gierlinger & Štefan Joško Riegelnik (eds.), Wittgenstein on Colour, De Gruyter. pp. 57-66. 2014.
  •  84
    The status of expressive content
    British Journal of Aesthetics 35 (2): 121-133. 1995.
  •  39
    Beauty and language
    British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (3): 258-267. 2007.
    I argue against Hume and Kant, who maintain that ‘beauty’ expresses a state of the subject, rather than describes features of the object. The word ‘beauty’ is far from being alone in having an expressive dimension, and that which it has falls short of individuating it semantically. Instead, I propose a theory of linguistic idealism with respect to ‘beauty’