•  1
    William of Ockham
    with Claude Panaccio and Jenny Pelletier
    Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2002.
  •  2
    Insolubles
    Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2001.
  •  2
    Binarium Famosissimum
    Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2003.
  •  5
    Book Reviews (review)
    with G. Weaver, D. M. Johnson, Rolf George, C. B. Schmitt, Susan Haack, Rainer BÄUERLE, M. E. Tiles, Recensione di L. Nurzia, Allen Stairs, Philip Kitcher, Nicholas Griffin, Rezensiert von Wolfgang Carl, I. Grattan-Guinness, Barry Smith, P. M. Simons, N. C. A. Da Costa, T. Pinkard, F. Hogemann, Gabriel Nuchelmans, Larry Hickman, and E. J. Ashworth
    History and Philosophy of Logic 2 (1-2): 133-185. 1981.
    MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE LOGIC RADULPHUS BRITO, Quaestiones super Priscianum minorern. Introduction and critical edition by H.W. Enders and J. Pinborg. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1980. 460 pp. 2 fascicules. DM 168 per fascicule. PAUL VINCENT SPADE, Peter of Ailly: concepts and insolubles. An annotated translation. (Synthese Historical Library, Volume 19.) Dordrecht, Holland: Boston, U.S.A.: London, England: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1980. xii + 193 pp. Df1.60/$31.40. VINCENT…Read more
  •  21
    Degrees of Being, Degrees of Goodness: Aquinas on Levels of Reality
    In Scott MacDonald & Eleonore Stump (eds.), Aquinas's Moral Theory: Essays in Honor of Norman Kretzmann, Cornell University Press. pp. 254-276. 2019.
  • More Liars
    Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen-Âge Grec Et Latin 56. 1988.
  •  102
    Walter Burley and the Obligationes attributed to William of Sherwood
    History and Philosophy of Logic 4 (1-2): 9-26. 1983.
    The history of the mediaeval obligationes-literature has only recently begun to be studied. Two important treatises in this literature, one by Walter Burley and the other attributed to William of Sherwood, have been edited by Romuald Green in a forthcoming book. But there is considerable doubt concerning the authenticity of the text attributed to Sherwood. The correct attribution and dating of this treatise is crucial for our understanding of the history of this literature. In this paper, we arg…Read more
  •  72
    New translations of the central mediaeval texts on the problem of universals are presented here in an affordable edition suitable for use in courses in mediaeval philosophy, history of mediaeval philosophy, and universals. Includes a concise Introduction, glossary of important terms, notes, and bibliography.
  •  74
    Paul of Venice: Logica Magna (review)
    Philosophical Review 91 (2): 275-278. 1982.
  •  56
    Abailard on Universals
    Noûs 14 (3): 479-483. 1980.
  •  77
    History of Logic
    Noûs 15 (2): 239-244. 1981.
  •  113
    Quodlibetal Questions (review)
    Philosophical Review 102 (1): 91-94. 1993.
  •  86
    De Dialectica
    with Augustine and B. Darrell Jackson
    Noûs 11 (1): 64. 1977.
  •  104
    1 There have been several editions of Fridugisus’ letter. I have consulted those in Jaques-Paul Migne, Patrologiae cursus completus … series latina, 221 vols., (Paris: J.-P. Migne, 1844–1864), vol. 105, cols. 751–756; Francesco Corvino, “Il ‘De nihilo et tenebris’ di Fredegiso di Tours,” Rivista critica di storia della filosofia (1956), pp. 273–286; and the most recent and authoritative edition, in Concettina Gennaro, Fridugiso di Tours e il “De substantia nihili et tenebrarum”: Edizione critica…Read more
  •  77
    The Cambridge Companion to Ockham (edited book)
    Cambridge University Press. 1999.
    The Franciscan William of Ockham was an English medieval philosopher, theologian, and political theorist. Along with Thomas Aquinas and Duns Scotus, he is regarded as one of the three main figures in medieval philosophy after around 1150. Ockham is important not only in the history of philosophy and theology, but also in the development of early modern science and of modern notions of property rights and church-state relations. This volume offers a full discussion of all significant aspects of O…Read more
  •  80
    divinity in reference to substance or in some other way; and I judge that a path of inquiry should be taken from that place which is agreed to be the clear starting point of all affairs, that is from the very foundations of the catholic faith. So, if I should ask whether He who is called Father is a substance, the response would be that He is a substance. But if I should ask whether the Son is a substance, the response would be the same. And no one..
  • Roger Swyneshed's Insolubilia
    Archives d'Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge 46. 1979.
  •  1
    Peter of Ailly : Concepts and Insolubles. An Annotated Translation
    Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 44 (4): 730-730. 1982.
  •  143
    What I want to talk about here is a puzzle for historians of philosophy who, like me, have spent a fair amount of time studying the history of mediaeval logic and semantic theory. I don’t know how to solve it, but in various forms it has come up repeatedly in my own work and in the work of colleagues I have talked with about it. I would like to share it with you now.
  • Obligationes
    Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. forthcoming.
  •  72