-
10Kant et le pouvoir de juger: sensiblilté et discursivité dans L'Analytique transcendantale de la Critique de la raison purePresses Universitaires de France - PUF. 1993.Kant déclare avoir établi sa table des catégories selon le 'fil conducteur' que fourniraient les 'simples formes logiques' du jugement. Contrairement à une tradition solidement établie, on est parti ici de l'hypothèse que ce 'fil conducteur' était autre chose qu'une simple manie architectonique. En l'admettant pour guide, on a engagé une lecture inédite de l'Analytique transcendantale, conduisant de l'analyse des formes logiques du jugement à l'élucidation de leur rapport aux synthèses perceptiv…Read more
-
Hegel et la critique de la métaphysique. Etude sur la Doctrine de l'Essence Bibliothéque d'histoire de la philosophieRevue de Métaphysique et de Morale 91 (2): 266-267. 1986.
-
12Actuality in Hegel's Logic in In Memoriam: Albert Hofstadter 1910-1989Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 13 (1): 115-124. 1988.
-
250Self-consciousness and self-reference: Sartre and WittgensteinEuropean Journal of Philosophy 16 (1). 2008.
-
3La deconstrucción kantienne du principe de raison suffisanteEnrahonar: Quaderns de Filosofía 36 43-63. 2004.
-
De différentes manières de se rapporter à soiRevue de Métaphysique et de Morale 68 (4): 419-434. 2010.
-
5Kant's leading thread in the analytic of the beautifulIn Rebecca Kukla (ed.), Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant's Critical Philosophy, Cambridge University Press. 2006.
-
221Kant's categories and the capacity to judge: Responses to Henry Allison and Sally SedgwickInquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (1). 2000.In response to Henry Allison's and Sally Sedwick's comments on my recent book, Kant and the Capacity to Judge, I explain Kant's description of the understanding as being essentially a "capacity to judge", and his view of the relationship between the categories and the logical functions of judgment. I defend my interpretation of Kant's argument in the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories in the B edition. I conclude that, in my interpretation, Kant's notions of the "a priori" and the "given…Read more
-
119Hegel's critique of metaphysicsCambridge University Press. 2007.Hegel's Science of Logic has received less attention than his Phenomenology of Spirit, but Hegel himself took it to be his highest philosophical achievement and the backbone of his system. The present book focuses on this most difficult of Hegel’s published works. Béatrice Longuenesse offers a close analysis of core issues, including discussions of what Hegel means by ‘dialectical logic’, the role and meaning of ‘contradiction’ in Hegel’s philosophy, and Hegel’s justification for the provocative…Read more
-
72The Transcendental Ideal and the Unity of the Critical SystemProceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress 1 521-537. 1995.
-
96Review: Grier, Kant's Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion (review)Mind 112 (448): 718-724. 2003.
-
130Review of Sebastian Rodl, Self-Consciousness (review)Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (9). 2007.
-
Kant et le pouvoir de juger. Sensibilité et discursivité dans l´Analytique transcendentale de la Critique de la raison pure (review)Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 52 (3). 1998.
-
73Kant and Freud on 'I'In Stefano Bacin, Alfredo Ferrarin, Claudio La Rocca & Margit Ruffing (eds.), Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht. Akten des XI. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, De Gruyter. pp. 299-320. 2013.
-
21Self‐Consciousness and Self‐Reference: Sartre and WittgensteinEuropean Journal of Philosophy 16 (1): 1-21. 2008.
-
3Kant's 'I' and Freud's EgoIn Stefano Bacin, Alfredo Ferrarin, Claudio La Rocca & Margit Ruffing (eds.), Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht. Akten des XI. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, De Gruyter. 2013.
-
158Kant's 'I' in 'I Ought To' and Freud's SuperegoAristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 86 (1): 19-39. 2012.There are striking structural similarities between Freud's ego and Kant's transcendental unity of apperception, which for Kant grounds our use of ‘I’ in ‘I think’. There are also striking similarities between Freud's superego and Kant's account of the mental structure that grounds our use of ‘I’ in the moral ‘I ought to’. The paper explores these similarities on three main points: the conflict of motivations internal to the mind, the relation between discursive and pre-discursive representation …Read more
-
157Kant’s Deconstruction of the Principle of Sufficient ReasonThe Harvard Review of Philosophy 9 (1): 67-87. 2001.
-
180Kant and the Capacity to JudgePhilosophical Review 109 (4): 645. 2000.Kant famously declares that “although all our cognition commences with experience, … it does not on that account all arise from experience”. This marks Kant’s disagreement with empiricism, and his contention that human knowledge and experience require both sensation and the use of certain a priori concepts, the Categories. However, this is only the surface of Kant’s much deeper, though neglected view about the nature of reason and judgment. Kant holds that even our a priori concepts are acquired…Read more
-
6IntroductionIn Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns, Princeton University Press. pp. 1-8. 2008.
-
46Response to Denis KambouchnerIn Gerald Schneewind (ed.), Teaching New Histories of Philosophy, . pp. 263-273. 2004.
-
16Kants „Ich“ in „Ich soll …“ und Freuds Über-IchDeutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 62 (3). 2014.
-
186Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure ReasonPrinceton University Press. 1998."Kant and the Capacity to Judge" will prove to be an important and influential event in Kant studies and in philosophy.
-
154Cassam and Kant on "how possible" questions and categorial thinkingPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (2): 510-517. 2008.No
-
166Synthesis, Logical Forms, and the Objects of our Ordinary Experience Response to Michael FriedmanArchiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 83 (2): 199-212. 2001.In the 82/2 (2000) issue of this journal, Michael Friedman has offered a stimulating discussion of my recent book, Kant and the Capacity to Judge. His conclusion is that on the whole I fail to do justice to what is most revolutionary about Kant's natural philosophy, and instead end up attributing to Kant a pre-Newtonian, Aristotelian philosophy of nature. This is because, according to Friedman, I put excessive weight on Kant's claim to have derived his categories from a set of logical forms of j…Read more
Areas of Specialization
1 more
Philosophy of Mind |
19th Century Philosophy |
20th Century Philosophy |
17th/18th Century Philosophy |
Immanuel Kant |
G. W. F. Hegel |