-
511What's wrong with possibilismAnalysis 69 (2): 219-226. 2009.Argues (1) that the debate between actualists and possibilists in deontic logic distorts what is really at issue, and (2) that reframing the debate as being about reasons strongly suggests that those with possibilist sympathies should adopt more moderate claims (which may nevertheless be distinct from actualism).
Nottingham, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Areas of Specialization
1 more
| Normative Ethics |
| Consequentialism |
| Well-Being |
| Consequentialism and Virtue Ethics |
| Social and Political Philosophy |
| Applied Ethics |
Areas of Interest
| Consequentialism |
| Well-Being |
| Consequentialism and Virtue Ethics |
PhilPapers Editorships
| Hybrid Accounts of Well-Being |