• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Stewart Shapiro

Ohio State UniversityUniversity of Connecticut
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    246
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    32
  •  News and Updates
    41

 More details
  • Ohio State University
    Department of Philosophy
    Regular Faculty
  • University of Connecticut
    Department of Philosophy
    Distinguished Visiting Professor (Part-time)
Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Philosophy of Language
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
Philosophy of Mathematics
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Language
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
Philosophy of Mathematics
  • All publications (246)
  • Anti-realism and modality
    In J. Czermak (ed.), Philosophy of Mathematics, Hölder-pichler-tempsky. pp. 269--287. 1993.
    Areas of MathematicsOntology of Mathematics
  •  274
    Logical Consequence: Models and Modality
    In Matthias Schirn (ed.), The Philosophy of Mathematics Today, Clarendon Press. 1998.
    Logical Consequence and Entailment
  •  1535
    What is mathematical logic?
    with John Corcoran
    Philosophia 8 (1): 79-94. 1978.
    This review concludes that if the authors know what mathematical logic is they have not shared their knowledge with the readers. This highly praised book is replete with errors and incoherency.
    Mathematical LogicIntroductions to Logic19th Century Logic20th Century LogicLogical Consequence and …Read more
    Mathematical LogicIntroductions to Logic19th Century Logic20th Century LogicLogical Consequence and Entailment
  •  91
    On the notion of effectiveness
    History and Philosophy of Logic 1 (1-2): 209-230. 1980.
    This paper focuses on two notions of effectiveness which are not treated in detail elsewhere. Unlike the standard computability notion, which is a property of functions themselves, both notions of effectiveness are properties of interpreted linguistic presentations of functions. It is shown that effectiveness is epistemically at least as basic as computability in the sense that decisions about computability normally involve judgments concerning effectiveness. There are many occurrences of the pr…Read more
    This paper focuses on two notions of effectiveness which are not treated in detail elsewhere. Unlike the standard computability notion, which is a property of functions themselves, both notions of effectiveness are properties of interpreted linguistic presentations of functions. It is shown that effectiveness is epistemically at least as basic as computability in the sense that decisions about computability normally involve judgments concerning effectiveness. There are many occurrences of the present notions in the writings of logicians; moreover, consideration of these notions can contribute to the clarification and, perhaps, solution of various philosophical problems, confusions and disputes
    Logic and Philosophy of Logic, MiscellaneousInformal Logic
  •  203
    Introduction to special issue: Abstraction and Neo-Logicism
    Philosophia Mathematica 8 (2): 97-99. 2000.
    Mathematical Neo-FregeanismLogicism in Mathematics
  •  196
    Structures and Logics: A Case for (a) Relativism
    Erkenntnis 79 (2): 309-329. 2014.
    In this paper, I use the cases of intuitionistic arithmetic with Church’s thesis, intuitionistic analysis, and smooth infinitesimal analysis to argue for a sort of pluralism or relativism about logic. The thesis is that logic is relative to a structure. There are classical structures, intuitionistic structures, and (possibly) paraconsistent structures. Each such structure is a legitimate branch of mathematics, and there does not seem to be an interesting logic that is common to all of them. One …Read more
    In this paper, I use the cases of intuitionistic arithmetic with Church’s thesis, intuitionistic analysis, and smooth infinitesimal analysis to argue for a sort of pluralism or relativism about logic. The thesis is that logic is relative to a structure. There are classical structures, intuitionistic structures, and (possibly) paraconsistent structures. Each such structure is a legitimate branch of mathematics, and there does not seem to be an interesting logic that is common to all of them. One main theme of my ante rem structuralism is that any coherent axiomatization describes a structure, or a class of structures. If one weakens the logic, then more axiomatizations become coherent
    Logical Pluralism
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback