-
27Special Report: Women in PhilosophyProceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 60 (4). 1987.
-
27Beyond “Bad Science”: Skeptical Reflections on the Value-Freedom of Scientific InquiryScience, Technology, and Human Values 8 (1): 7-17. 1983.
-
25Pornography, oppression, and freedom : a closer lookIn Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring ethics: an introductory anthology, Oxford University Press. 2009.
-
25The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolutionEnvironmental Ethics 3 (4): 365-369. 1981.
-
23Mead, George Herbert, 133,135,171 Mill, John Stuart, 55,188, 242In F. Thomas Burke, D. Micah Hester & Robert B. Talisse (eds.), Dewey's logical theory: new studies and interpretations, Vanderbilt University Press. 2002.
-
21The Fate of KnowledgePrinceton University Press. 2002.Helen Longino seeks to break the current deadlock in the ongoing wars between philosophers of science and sociologists of science--academic battles founded on disagreement about the role of social forces in constructing scientific knowledge. While many philosophers of science downplay social forces, claiming that scientific knowledge is best considered as a product of cognitive processes, sociologists tend to argue that numerous noncognitive factors influence what scientists learn, how they pack…Read more
-
21Who Knows: From Quine to a Feminist Empiricism. Lynn Hankinson NelsonIsis 83 (1): 179-179. 1992.
-
19Evidence in the sciences of behaviorIn P. Achinstein (ed.), Scientific Evidence: Philosophical Theories & Applications, The Johns Hopkins University Press. 2005.
-
18Maurice A. Finocchiaro, "History of Science as Explanation" (review)Journal of the History of Philosophy 13 (2): 279. 1975.
-
1710. Discussion Note: Distributed Cognition in Epistemic Cultures Discussion Note: Distributed Cognition in Epistemic Cultures (pp. 637-644) (review)Philosophy of Science 69 (4): 569-572. 2002.
-
17Foundations and Methods From Mathematics to Neuroscience: Essays Inspired by Patrick Suppes (edited book)Stanford Univ Center for the Study. 2015."Center for the Study of Language and Information, Leland Stanford Junior University."
-
13Foundations and methods from mathematics to neuroscience: essays inspired by Patrick Suppes (edited book)CSLI Publications. 2014.During his long and continuing scholarly career, Patrick Suppes contributed significantly both to the sciences and to their philosophies. The volume consists of papers by an international group of Suppes colleagues, collaborators, and students in many of the areas of his expertise, building on or adding to his insights. Michael Friedman offers an overview of Suppes accomplishments and of his unique perspective on the relation between science and philosophy. Paul Humphreys, Stephen Hartmann, and …Read more
-
12The Pluralist StanceIn ¸ Itekellersetal:Sp, . 2006.This essay introduces the volume Scientific Pluralism (Volume 19 of Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science). Varieties of recent pluralisms are surveyed, the difference between monism and pluralism vis a vis the sciences is clarified, and the authors’ notion of scientific pluralism is advanced.
-
7The fate of knowledge in social theories of scienceIn Frederick F. Schmitt (ed.), Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge, Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 135--158. 1994.
-
7The Death Of Nature: Women, Ecology, And The Scientific Revolution (review)Environmental Ethics 3 (4): 365-369. 1981.
-
6Book reviews (review)Philosophical Psychology 7 (3): 395-411. 1994.Talk about Beliefs Mark Crimmins, 1992 Cambridge, MA, MIT Press xi + 214 pp., $25.00The Roots of Thinking Mahne Sheets‐Johnstone, 1990 Philadelphia, PA, Temple University Press ix + 389 pp.Varieties of Moral Personality: Ethics and Psychological Realism Owen Flanagan, 1991 Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press 393 ppBehavioral Endocrinology Jill S. Becker, S. Marc Breedlove & David Crews, 1992 Cambridge, MA, MIT Press xxiii + 574 ppLanguages of the Mind: Essays on Mental Representation Ray S. …Read more
-
6Navigating the Social Turn in Philosophy of ScienceFilozofia 64 (4): 312-323. 2009.Over the last three decades the role of social values in science has been the topic issue in the disputes of the philosophers of science against the representatives of science studies. Due to the key status of sciences in developed countries and societies it is necessary, so the author, not only to acknowledge, that cognitive and epistemic practices have their social dimensions, but also to make the practices of the research communities themselves open for critical examination from different per…Read more
-
5Subjects, Power, and KnowledgeIn Janet A. Kourany (ed.), The Gender of Science, Prentice-hall. pp. 310-21. 2002.
-
3Beyond “Bad Science‘Science, Technology, and Human Values 8 (1): 7-17. 1983.It is conventional to treat instances of research where social values have played a role as “bad science.” This article discusses instances of research that meet standards of “good science”, but that are nevertheless inflected by social values and uses these examples to argue that values can enter into research without thereby disqualifying the scientific status of the research. Other categories are needed to accommodate this kind of research.
-
2Introduction: The Pluralist StanceIn Stephen H. Kellert, Helen Longino & C. Kenneth Waters (eds.), Scientific Pluralism, University of Minnesota Press. 2006.
-
2Individuals or populations?In Nancy Cartwright & Eleonora Montuschi (eds.), Philosophy of Social Science: A New Introduction, Oxford University Press. 2014.
-
1Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific InquiryJournal of the History of Biology 25 (2): 340-341. 1990.
-
1Theoretical Pluralism and the Scientific Study of Behavior (edited book)University of Minnesota Press. 2006.
-
Marjorie Grene's philosophical naturalismIn R. E. Auxier & L. E. Hahn (eds.), The Philosophy of Marjorie Grene, La Salle, Illinois: Open Court. pp. 29--83. 2002.Marjorie Grene was a philosophical naturalist avant la lettre. This essay surveys some problems with contemporary (late 20th century) naturalism, argues that Grene’s criticisms of ancient epistemologies are applicable to their contemporary versions, and finds an alternative, philosophically richer, naturalism in Grene’s appropriation of J.J. Gibson’s ideas on perception and in her insistence on treating humans as no less a part of nature than plants and other animals.
-
Review of Jill S. Becker, S. Marc Breedlove & David Crews' Behavioral Endocrinology (review)Philosophical Psychology 7 401-401. 1994.
Stanford, California, United States of America