•  427
  •  133
    Unification, universalism, and rational choice theory
    with John Ferejohn
    Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 9 (1-2): 71-84. 1995.
    Green and Shapiro's critique of rational choice theory underestimates the value of unification and the necessity of universalism in science. The central place of intentionality in social life makes both unification and universalism feasible norms in social science. However, “universalism” in social science may be partial, in that the independence hypothesis—that the causal mechanism governing action is context independent—may hold only locally in certain classes of choice domains.
  •  196
    Voluntary Slavery and the Limits of the Market
    Law and Ethics of Human Rights 3 (1): 87-109. 2009.
    This paper considers the normative assessment of bonded labor from the perspectives of libertarianism and Paretian welfare economics. I argue that neither theory can account for our objections to bonded labor arrangements; moreover, they fail in interesting ways. Reflecting on their normative failures focuses us on other considerations besides individual choice and efficiency. Such considerations include: the effects of labor markets on workers' preferences and capacities; the exploitation of th…Read more
  •  33
    Ideals of egalitarianism and sufficiency in global justice
    In Colin Murray Macleod (ed.), Justice and equality, University of Calgary Press. pp. 53-71. 2010.
  •  67
    Book Review: The Idea of Justice (review)
    Political Theory 39 (4): 560-565. 2011.
  •  90
    Ethics, economics, and markets
    Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 3 (1): 68. 2010.
    The Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics interviewed professor Satz in early October 2009 when she visited Erasmus University Rotterdam to present material from her new book at the Research Seminar of the Erasmus Institute for Philosophy and Economics.
  •  136
    Response to open Peer commentaries on "thinking about the human neuron mouse"
    with Henry T. Greely, Mildred K. Cho, and Linda F. Hogle
    American Journal of Bioethics 7 (5). 2007.
    This Article does not have an abstract
  •  376
    What Do We Owe the Global Poor?
    Ethics and International Affairs 19 (1): 47-54. 2005.
    In this article, Satz critiques "both Pogge's use of the causal contribution principle as well as his attempt to derive all of our obligations to the global poor from the need to refrain from harming others."